all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why?? Why are they allowing slop in their platform??? Can’t wait for so many security flaws in their packages :)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    AFAIK this was always the plan, they were just getting bombarded in so much Slop that they made a full pause on all AI assisted work. There still is this part of the policy:

    Reviewers may reject a submission, including without further review, based on the extent or role of generated material or concerns about its review, quality, or maintainability.

    which is intended to get rid of the completely vibecoded slop. Flathub is taking a similar stance to it as to proprietary software: They allow it but don't support it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    It's difficult to police and enforce. It requires manual review of entire code bases. Not doable for them. Not the point of the project either, you use flathub when you don't want the package system and get something directly from the dev that just works.

  • source
  • parent
  • 13 comments in c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 23 points 1 month ago
    [–] 40 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I think it's a reasonable policy. Let people make informed decisions on what they want to install.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yeah. As long as you're forced to disclose everyone wins really.

    It also benefits devs who don't use it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    For the latter statement, that's only true if there's a user-side filter option. Otherwise they'll get buried amid all the vibe coding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Yeah. Imho, they'd be no point of adding it if there wasn't. should also describe the extent too, like whether its code, music only, video's, or other assets. etc.. Or just that its used for patches

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago
    [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Think this is similar to Steam's right?
    If so I think this is fine

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    It should not be up to a platform what users can install or not, because that's what Microsoft, Apple, Google and Facebook are doing. Even if it's vibe coded. IMHO.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Fuck that. Only cowards refuse to ban slop.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I’m shocked they backed down on a short sighted, unenforceable, and ultimately detrimental policy so quickly!

    AI assisted coding is here and it isn’t going away.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I spent today working with AI to improve some bash scripts I use each year for extra life. It was super productive because I got to do exactly what I wanted and was able to improve some basic things in a way that made sense to me because it built off of what I knew and made last year. It was great, and it explained why things I was doing were not as good because of spawning extra processes or backing up some changes so if the script fails it returns my back to the beginning. It also let me combine a few scripts. I can imagine that someone who is even half decent at programming could make some really neat things with AI assistance.

    I used Google Gemini and it was free. I could have learned it all on my own, but I have a lot going on in my life and this worked well.

  • source
  • parent