all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 month ago* (1 child)
  1. At least ~90% of it appears to be an expansion and not "new" pipeline. I guess they're just making it sound like a whole new pipeline to appease the seppies.

https://opendatacanada.ca/articles/west-coast-pipeline-pacific-link

  1. IMO we need to push for transparency. It's my understanding that under reporting of leaks and spills is a common issue. As such we need to leverage the threat of active resistance to ensure better management of both the existing pipeline and any marginal expansions.

  2. We also need to push for clarity on First Nations engagement. Especially with regards to "elected vs traditional" leadership. The existence of 2 parallel systems of authority obfuscates who legitimately represents given communities and their interests.

  3. We gotta make Carney understand that investment in renewables projects must exceed investments in oil and gas.

  4. The economy doesn't have to get much worse before protests like Fairy Creek start offering a comparable standard of living to wage-slavour.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    He's just appeasing the AB chuds, it will never happen.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/alberta@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If the pipeline is being built with government funding, then it should be publicly owned to the same share, and any share of the money the government makes from it should be used to help fund public services.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    How many oil projects did Trudeau sign off on in 9 years? It's never enough for these climate criminals.

  • source