Our gov is a dumb fuck bit he did one thing right requiring them to disclose their usage information. They did but redacted the important parts. How the fuck do they get to get away with this?

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 41 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fuck Data Centers and anyone that supports this shit

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You have been banned from c/Conservatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Conservatives in the USA are extremely pissed about data centers.

    However, there are probably still a few more trans kids who want to play collegiate sports, so unfortunately, they'll still need to ignore the coming economic catastrophe, the horrible job market, murder of children, taxes flowing to Israel, and a climate set to boil us alive and still vote Republican. Sorry.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    There's a subgroup on Lemmy that will absolutely melt down if you mention data center water usage. And I can't help but think "The Water Hoax" rhetoric churning through the LessWrong community has played a major role.

    However you square it, though, you can't help but consider something like this peculiar.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If you attack the electricity and carbon sides of data centers, you might at least be able to divert some of the money tied up in AI towards the construction of renewable energy. Those are also stronger arguments than the water usage argument. Arguing from your most defensible position(s) is generally ideal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    The energy usage is off the charts. I've spent time in data centres (a long time ago) and none of them at the time had massive water usage so I believe it's only a very wasteful subset that are being dicks.

    On the flip side, data centres are taking up a fifth of all electricity usage in the whole country where I live and fucking our carbon targets so people are pissed about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They also do that in the Netherlands. Shady fuckers. Burn them all.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Because it’s not a data center, it’s a superintelligence factory.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Hey, you need to update the post.

    UPDATE: Improper redaction reveals Lincoln’s Google Data Center water and electricity usage

    You can just select the text and it'll show you the peak electrical demand was 52.65 MW and the annual water consumption was 13.299 Mgal.

    Then on the next page, you can see Use Tax Paid: 47,687,666 Sales Tax Paid: 8,134,806 and Expected Refund: 55,822,472.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    Vote local also. Maybe it can help.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    So, just in Nebraska, Google data centers use roughly 3 billion liters / year.

    Which, to put in perspective, is about 3 days of water use for the entire metropolis of greater Vancouver. (3.11 million people)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Our gov

    [X] Doubt

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    However, using a computer cursor to highlight the redacted text box in the report to DWEE, then copying and pasting it into a separate document reveals that Agate LLC is reporting 52.65 megawatts of electricity during peak electrical demand and 13.299 megagallons of water between cooling towers, evaporative systems and site operations in the last year. That totals out to 13 million gallons of water.

    For context, 13 million gallons is enough to fill around 20 Olympic-size swimming pools, and is less than half of what the City of Lincoln reports using on Sept. 29.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Ya, I was confused by this wording. Are they saying that the data centers usage for the entire year was less than 50% of the city's usage on just 1 day of the year, or are they saying that the usage per day was a bit less than 50% of the city's usage?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Why did you leave off the next paragraph?

    The six data centers reporting as of Sept. 30 show a total use of 765 million gallons of water last year, enough water to fill 1,159.93 Olympic-size swimming pools.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    That does not sound like a lot. Only 50'000 m³. Roughly as much as 250 households.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I have to wonder if they keep water in the news because it's pretty far down the list of problems that come with these technologies and the next generations will be closed loop cooling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    The sole fact that data on a company destroying the environment can be considered a trade secret is all you need to know.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Save this for all the people claiming that data centers don’t actually use that much water.

  • source