all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So RN now almost have as many seats as the Communists, almost (19 vs 14). Or to put it another way, 14 seats out of 348

I mean it's not great that they have ANY seats, but I'm not connecting the headline with the facts

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    RN is weird, on one hand they had very little Senate presence, on the other it’s a bunch of elections that they end up in second position at the national elections. So in the lead up to the national elections a lot of eyes are on them.

    I’m no expert, so I hope someone else could come in and bd explain it better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    It's been the whole thing of Macron, to give them presence and importance. You can always count on the "moderate" parties to kiss the ass of the nazis until they win.

    Not that Macron ever was moderate, but he said he was.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Why is it that all the coverage I see about France’s elections is about her? Is Jean-Luc Mélenchon the competition? He’s the only other person by name I’ve seen by causally reading about this topic.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Directed lobbying and funding. Big money talks, everyone else is silenced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Every plutocrat on Earth is financing fascist propaganda and candidates. It's not a coincidence that they're all going mask off at the same time, or that every capitalist "democracy" is failing to acknowledge or respond to the threat.

  • source
  • parent
  • 9 comments in c/europa@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    They read Facebook, that was all they needed

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Senatorial elections are not a general election. There are no ordinary people going to the urns, only elected officials from the local governments. Doesn't make it better but less directly "the people hasn't read their program".

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    AfD voters also didn't read their plans. I'm just going to assume they're illiterate.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Like all right-wing voters they don’t care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The thing is, those plans will absolutely affect them and they will absolutely care when they're carried out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    There are way too many dumb people in the world.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    They don't read ; they assume it will be "like the old times", which they have not even lived through. I think the mayors who vote for the far-right are just here for the graft.

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    As an American living in France: I came here because France is better than this.

    En tant qu’Américain vivant en France : je suis venu ici parce que la France est mieux que cela.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Any Frenchmen here to provide some context on this? Why are so many people voting for a criminal who is sponsored by the Kremlin?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Okay let me try.

    First, senatorial elections are indirect elections. Meaning that senators are elected from an electoral college mostly from local officials. The system is extremely complex and depends on the departement's number of senators, itself roughly proportional to population. The senate as an institution is really controversial, since it has almost always been very right wing because France has a rural bias in terms of of sheer number of rural municipalities vs. urban and more progressive ones (overgeneralisation I know, but mostly true).

    Second, the "surge" is only 12 seats of a total of 178 up for election. Not a tsunami wave per se, but still worrying as the system tends to favor the traditional right wing, as it reflects a much larger proportion of far-right presence in local, departemental and regional councils.

    And third, because like everywhere else in Europe, nazi cunts from USA, Russia and Israel flood social media with propaganda to destroy democracy from the inside. And a lot of major media outlets are owned by fascist billionaires.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    French senators are not elected directly by people, but by "great voters" instead. These "great voters" are every one who are on active mandate ; deputies, city councils members, etc. As french right wing have won a lot of elections for five years, they have now enough "great voters" to get few seats in the senate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Main reason is that all mass media has been bought up by the billionaire class.

    These giga-rich assholes would rather support the far right than anything remotely left leaning because they'll do anything to continue paying no tax, as they were essentially doing under Macron.

    When I was a kid, the Lepen were frowned upon and considered racist nuts by the media. Now they're everywhere and totally normalized.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    @MicroWave I see the French electorate has decided that nothing of note happened in the 1940s. Certainly nothing to draw any lessons from. So that’s nice.

  • source