I'm surprised they think an American company can afford the bad PR in Canada right now.
post
If only there were a business near by that sold cordless sawzalls and grinders.
explains the camera on a giant pole attached to the massive solor panel in the fencing I saw... bright blinking blue light, very visible at night.
No it doesn't
sure it does... it's a newly deployed camera in the middle of the parking lot. no reason for a normal camera since they already have like 6 on the building facing the lot.
this is clearly getting something that their normal cameras don't... and it has its own dedicated power system. why...
maga loving home Depot would certainly deploy this shit anywhere they can.
how does it not explain
also, never trust a company to be honest and true.. they will, especially home Depot and the fascist loving ceo will do this crap without care for anything or anyone.
Ok but this is private property they can put up whatever cameras they want.
Flock cameras are bad because municipalities pay them to put them on PUBLIC roads.
You're right that being flock doesn't matter. They would likely have cameras in their store no matter what.
One issue with flock is that the data is stored off site and can be theoretically accessed by people outside of the relevant security team.
Video recording of all kinds should be banned in all public facing commercial institutions. While there could be arguments made for people just using stores that don't have them in practice that option doesn't always exist.
No store is storing their camera footage onsite unless it's less than ten cameras or it's high security. It's all cloud services.
If you wanna ban private surveillance on private property you're gonna have to change the constitution
Security of person is what allows it to be banned in public facing parts of private property. Not the other way around. They could still keep it in the employee sections and warehouses









all 22 comments