This happens in Europe.

I’m a nurse looking for something else because my job now is breaking my back, literally. I was at home for several weeks because of back pain.

A B.Sc. Physician Assistant would mean that 20% bump, it’s something I’ve always considered, but I’d miss just working 35 hours a week instead of 39. That’s 16 hours per month, 2 free days per month. I’d feel like a loser. I really want those free 2 days per month.

There’s a small practice that would cover the costs of that B.Sc. and offer me a job, so I’d work and study at the same time… but 39 hours per week, till I retire… I don’t want that.

There are other bachelors I could pursue, like Case Management, but that would earn me less than that 20%. Still 39 hours per week.

I’m not going back to bedside.

To make it more complicated, this 35 hour per week workplace is unionized, most smaller practices are not.

If you know of other bachelors I could pursue, simply post them.

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20 points 1 month ago

20% pay increase for a 12% time increase. Honestly, those numbers aren’t big enough to entice me on their own.

But I think the bigger thing is job satisfaction. In your current job you spend 35 hours a week doing something you hate. Would a PA mean you’re spending 39 hours doing something you enjoy?

I would focus this more on your happiness than economics. Being miserable has no money associated with it but it’s the thing that follows you around 24/7.

If you just want to get away from bedside, you might want to keep shopping around for other degrees you think you’d like. If being a PA is something you know you’d like (never mind the 39 hours - just the tasks the job itself entails), that seems like a smart path to follow!

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    How do I decide if I stay at a 35 hour per week job that’s breaking my back or start studying a bachelor to work your regular 39 hours per week but earning 20% more than now after I finish it?

    You may benefit from a cost benefit analysis.

  • source
  • Sounds like you don't have 2 free days a month anyway seeing as you're incapacitated by the back pain to begin with.
    The 35h is a false premise of it comes with debilitating pain

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago*

    39 hours a week but it's not taking days away due to back pain. It sound like you can't do the 35 hour a week job so I'm not sure why you're using that as a basis. It's gone, mourn it, and make your decisions.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    The union should demand better equipment to protect its members. There are bed lifts and training to use them that should be included in your job.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Most corporate drones that I knew eventually wanted to throw it all away for an outside job of physical labour. That's how empty, soulless and dissonant corporation work becomes. I was one of them.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Insurance companies like hiring nurses. Adjustors who understand medical terms and conditions do very well. No bachelor requirements

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Laughing at myself for working 40+ hours like a chump

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    My rule of thumb is that there is very little point in planning for things that occur >5 years from now. Priorities change, external factors change, and so on.

    That said physical health is maybe the single exception.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    2 extra days a month aren't going to mean anything if your back is too screwed up to enjoy them. I'd easily lose 4 hours of free time a week if the trade off was pain versus no pain.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I jerk guys off behind a dumpster for cash. Need strong wrists hours flexible.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    The 20 first years of my life I never really stood up for myself.

  • source