all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Maximum call stack size exceeded.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Only if you need to implement everything as a recursive call. This scenario can be nicely implemented with a simple loop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Even with a loop, if you consider that you haven't finished looking into something until you've executed all sub-instructions, you would still have to keep track of everything in a stack. You would run out of memory at some point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    As I shift my head up and down, I take in the next instruction, and I get just a bit sleepier as a memory allocation bug takes another part of my consciousness. My kneecaps rattle as they hit the floor, a screw loose in one of them because I haven’t been in for maintenance in a bit, and my eyes gently shut, my head on the floor, turned to the side, and my last thought before I wake up in a bay somewhere, thinking, it’s mean to troll androids.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    This is the most Mimi thing ever.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Mimi thought the shirt was just an aid for the anatomically ignorant

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago
    [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    This puts a lot of strain on the eye muscles!

  • source
  • 21 comments in c/comicstrips@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 69 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago
    [–] 15 points 1 month ago* (5 children)

    Wow. Scrolling with that halftone pattern on my phone's OLED screen makes for some really wild flicker. Never noticed it do anything like that before.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    As the other commenter pointed out, it’s most likely the moire effect, not oled. If you don’t know what that is you should look it up! Super interesting!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Hmm. That's a good thought, because when I was initially seeing it, I had the image scaled, but it also shows up at 1:1 ratio, so that can't be what's causing it.

    EDIT: Not visible on my desktop computer monitor (though there, I'm necessarily using different software), even using various non-integer-scaled versions of the image.

    I don't think that it's VRR flicker---the phone screen is VRR and doesn't permit VRR to be disabled---because I can't see it in the pure white areas, and I believe that it should also show up there if that's the cause. I also can't see it below roughly Mimi's nipples in the lighter portion of the halftoned area.

    EDIT2: Oh, wait a minute. "1:1" in the Android image editor I used isn't referring to screen resolution, but rather to aspect ratio. searches Man, I don't even think that F-Droid has an image viewer that can display a panned image at 1:1 resolution. The concept of "scale everything to try to ameliorate small screen" is so baked into Android software. Trying to crop it to the narrow axis of my hardware screen resolution and then panning still shows the flicker effect, but it could be maybe that there's subpixel placement or something happening.

    And I can't see it on my Linux desktop, but that could be because the software I'm using there is scaling it to produce something at a fixed resolution when I zoom and then when I pan, rendering that to the screen aligned with pixels and I don't have software that can do a 3D hardware-displayed version of the image that wouldn't be pixel-aligned as I pan around, opposite problem from on Android. I used to use gliv for that, but it looks like it only works with obsolete versions of GTK now, and I can't build it any more. Darn, I wish someone would do a new "hardware image viewer".

    sighs

    Well, you're probably right, then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Your comments made me spend too much time looking at it and I have different dot patterns depending if I have the image as the only thing on screen or not, even though its exactly the same size.

    They also make the background move in a very uncomfortable way.

    Technology is weird.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    The winning move is not to play?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    "So, is it just dealer's choice then, or what?"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago
    [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • Is this an autoerotic asphyxiation joke?

  • source