all 41 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 42 points 1 month ago* (13 children)

School is a place to store children so adults can work. It just so happens to also be a decent place to learn. Remember the order of priorities

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    School also is a way to force children to get used to factory schedules from industrialism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Schools are also a place to expose kids to topics and resources their households may not be able to afford to show them. Schools provide a large range to topics for which students can discover their interest/strengths. They provide initial structure to build to those dreams.

    Without schools, most kids would just be learning to do whatever their parents do. That would be the only education they'd have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    What factories run from 9am to 3pm ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    More like schools developed strict schedules during industrialization and it was more society adapting even children to all being at the right room at the same time, all taking lunch at the same time, obeying a strict hierarchy without question, not leaving until the exact allowed time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    My kids are presently "stored" at day care so I can work. It's a great environment for them, playing with their peers and learning things. What's so terrible about that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Nothing. But there's a reason western governments offer daycare subsidies as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    What could that reason be? Could it possibly be so that populations are more productive? That's so nefarious! How dare they support me to work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I never said it was nefarious. An anatomy book isn't nefarious for naming all of the bones in the human body. You're bringing your preconceptions to my incredibly dry quips and descriptions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You're bringing your dry quips to a thread where idiots are saying the purpose if school is to support capitalism or some such.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    I mean, it is. But that's a uselessly broad, unfocused statement, like "coffee beans are killing giraffes." A system perpetuates itself or it fails. Schools both yield new workers and temporarily free them of obligations so that they can work.

    Looking at impact and assessing whether it aligns with your intended lifestyle Is far more useful than internet slap fighting

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Life should be a challenge. It's good for your character. - Rich nepo-babies, with no character.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    To be fair this culture of overworking yourself to a point of counterproductivity like that isn't exclusive to America. Japan and Korea come to mind as being even worse. But yeah, seriously, that's no excuse.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    How is this an American priority problem? This is, like, (with some exceptions) a worldwide approach to schooling. European schools start early too, Asian schools still have homework.... It's a world priority problem?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Religion fucks everything up always

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Nah, only 99.99% of the time. :)

    (I think Sikhs are generally an exception - those folks seem to largely have doing good things figured out pretty well. I'm sure there are exceptions, but I sure haven't heard of any)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    It is not puritanical, it's labour slavers. Neither work nor school exists for our benefit. They both exist to benefit the powerful and they will reshape both to manage their power as they see fit.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Can't just let the common folk run amok.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Actually the homework debate does have a simple answer, the older you get the less effective it is. Not to mention it was created as a punishment in like, 1097 or some shit.

    You can cultivate attention to detail without killing someone's social skills.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    So many Americans think it all started in 1620 with the Mayflower landing at Plymouth Rock, when in fact 13 years earlier it began with the first permanent English settlement at Jamestown, Virginia. And we gloss over the beginning of slavery in American in 1619. Yes, slavery beat the famous religious landing by a whole year.

    So our revisionist history started very early.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I wish it was just 'that godforsaken country'. I wish.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Don't forget profits. Stocks go brrrr.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    The purpose is to make Americans dumber in public schools. It has nothing to do with puritanical whatever the fuck.

    Americans are too dumb now to even know WHY they’re dumb. 🥰😂🍿

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago*

    ...nothing to do with puritanical...

    I thought so too and that they were incorrectly referring to Protestant work ethic. Turns out to be the same thing.

    The Protestant work ethic, also known as the Calvinist work ethic or the Puritan work ethic, is a work ethic concept in the social sciences, particularly sociology, economics, and history. It emphasizes that a person's subscription to the values espoused by the Protestant faith, particularly Calvinism, results in diligence, discipline, and frugality.
    [...]
    Those with the ethic believed that good fortune (e.g. from hard work) is a vindication of God in this life

    Still dumb to say that hard work is good because it is hard but some bad ideas die slowly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    And dumb idiots like yourself are too stupid to realize it's both. Many Republicans literally believe "work is prayer" and that "idle hands are the devil's workshop". This is a thing taught to the poor and the wealthy in countless churches.

    Maybe next time you want to bash people you actually know what you're talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Who the hell is evoking the Puritans?!

    Don't say that word three times in a mirror.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It’s incredible how little historical/geographic context that Americans maintain.

  • source