all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s because they are losing the race to open source models and are looking to slow things down before investors come calling for their money back.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They're losing the race, but they're also chronic liars and cheats. You know they'll just keep doing what they're doing, while insisting every other model needs to be outlawed for breaking laws they aren't bound by.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    Absolutely. They know that AI and datacenters are unpopular. They have planned out their infrastructure and their control over it. Now it's time to run to the government and ask for laws to protect their infrastructure and build towards monopolization.

    This is how capitalism works. "It's new tech, we need to stop regulations, it's for everyone, here, have it for free". Then it is built into the infrastructure, forced dependence on the technology, and fully privatized, prices skyrocket, service gets worse, and the capitalist controlled state enforces the privatized ownership through "regulations" that are written entirely to maintain the current monopoly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They are scared of chinese open source AI

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    I suspect that what they mean by "reckless" AI development is unregulated or otherwise uncontrolled development, especially open weight/open source.

    Nvidia just bought HuggingFace. I believe this is an embrace/extend/extinguish play. This places a large corporation in control of the most popular platform for community-driven AI development, a corporation that has supported and cooperated with the Trump administration. Now all the government has to do is push through some regulations, and suddenly everyone using HuggingFace has to register with a government ID in order to continue using it. As an independent group HuggingFace might object, refuse to implement the requirement, file a lawsuit, or at least drag their feet, because it would hurt their customer base. But, Nvidia's primary customer base is the major platforms, not HuggingFace subscribers, and reducing access to tools on HuggingFace will push more traffic back toward the major platforms, so Nvidia will comply without argument and when people complaints they'll just say "it's the law, complain to the government".

    So, the "leading experts" (Musk, Altman, etc), who are already in bed with the government in multiple ways, call for regulation, and the government says "OK, here's some regulation". And who gets impacted the most by it? Small, open source developers and community projects.

    I'm not a fan of the current generation of machine learning tools, the way they're being used to produce mountains of garbage, or the rest of the market around them, but I do believe that if any good is going to come out of these tools it will be community driven, not owned and operated by a multi-billion dollar corporation. The government is going to try to clamp down on open weight and self-hosted models, under the guise of "safety", and try to push users into the large AI platforms, where their use can be tracked, controlled, and monetized.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I don't believe them.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    lol it's because they can't keep up and are knee deep in debt. Let them all burn

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    If only they were in a position where they could lead by example.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    This is just a ploy to take down Anthropic while they keep all the gov contracts

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Yeah, they'll continue full speed ahead, and force others to abide by the rules. They'll apologize later, it'll be too late, no repercussions will happen, etc.

    Tale as old as time. Sam and Elon just need to die.

  • source
  • parent
  • 30 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Once again... Because Chinese models keep forcing US AI companies to prematurely release their backstock of "future" iterations, meant to sustain the hype train: leading to plateauing, decreases in investor confidence, and ultimately the demise of the AI bubble. And are we referring to Sam Altman as "OpenAI boss" now? Because people might otherwise stop reading after: "Sam Altman says..."

  • source
  • [–] 98 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    Or the technology has plateau’d and this is their cover story. I don’t know, but these two people are known liars.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Model collapse is finally landing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    But...but... GPT6 Astra is AGI! I swear!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    GPT6 couldn't even make me the most simple blueprint for merging 8 belts into 4 in Factorio. AGI it is most certainly not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    I refuse to pay for AI, so I only use the freely available GPT, and I can't comment on coding or other technical capabilities, but I feel like in the last couple of months, it has actually become dumber.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The one thing that hasn’t plateaued yet is the ability of open models running on a gaming PC to match OpenAI and Anthropic are doing. I just watched a video on the Codacus YouTube channel where the guy is running Qwen 3.8 Flash, a 177B model, on his RTX 3060.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Half a year ago Musk was saying this is a hard take-off for AI, what means AI would improve itself and you basically can't stop it anymore. Now he says he wants a pause. The hard take-off seems to have fallen flat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 1 month ago

    "Everyone else please stop development whilst we continue!"

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

    Just yesterday AI told my brother that a run of 4 in crib is actually 2 runs of 3. I made him pull out the Bicycle official card game book and look up the rules because I knew that was wrong.

    Why even use it if you have to double check everything it says?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    In some way, this doesn't change much to "search engines". Before AI you had to search online and verify the result. Now you ask an AI and have to check because it will hallucinate when it doesn't have all the data.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    "AI" is not one thing, just like trusting one website is not trusting another website

    Why use the internet when sometimes the thing posted is wrong?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Because you can judge the source of the information yourself, whereas with AI, who tf knows?

    What I do know is that it’s wrong enough that I should double check everything it says.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Its just a pile of math. They need to stop using the word intelligence. Intelligent and smart are the buzzwords these morons all crave when consuming the billionaire owned production lines like good little cattle. Train a dog. Theres some real AI. Or don’t. Idgaf.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    We know it's not AI in the original sense of the word, but we don't exactly know what intelligence is either.
    Human brains are but electricity going over logic gates, which boils down to 'pile of math' as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    The "original sense" of AI is that it was the term used by computer scientists as an umbrella term for efforts into machine decision making. It didn't turn into HAL from 2001 or EDI from mass effect for decades after that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Stop running LLMs attached to an unsupervised eval yolo harness in an endless loop you fucking dinguses.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    AI has never improved, nor will it ever. There’s nothing to worry about.

  • source