all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 1 month ago

Rather than expecting our users to learn complex menus and click through elaborate sales funnels, these platforms operate by capturing [INCORRECTLY GUESSING]* high-level human goals and silently executing the grunt work in the background, [LEADING THEM DOWN THE GARDEN PATH]*.

*FTFY

Fucking CAPTURING? JFC, GTFO. The absolute audacious bullshit hidden in corpospeak.

No, thank you. Wipe this shit off and flush it.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You simply can't get most people to accurately and completely express their intent. Most people will express very few necessary details. "Find me a flight" will be what you get. Not "Find me a nonstop flight from Atlanta to Anchorage on September 27th after 4pm". People will leave out the details and you'll have to give them buttons and autocomplete anyway. I agree with simplifying complex processes with simple decisions but expecting average people to accurately express their intent is a fool's errand.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 month ago

    Reading through the article I wasn't sold on the argument until I came to third example:

    Many traditional productivity tools require you to manually construct task lists, drag items across Kanban boards, and assign micro-deadlines. Goblin.tools is a free, single-page suite of single-task AI tools designed specifically for neurodivergent users or anyone feeling overwhelmed, requiring zero sign-ups or configuration.

    Many interfaces can be too overwhelming, particularly for neurodivergent folk, so it's important to consider different paradigms for interaction.

  • source