top 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 79 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ukraine is considering dismantling its ban on pornography as lawmakers seek to bring a large online adult industry into the tax system and redirect millions of dollars toward the country’s wartime needs.

Yaroslav Zhelezniak, an opposition lawmaker who chairs Parliament’s finance committee, estimates legalization could generate as much as $25 million a year, according to The Wall Street Journal.

He says that would be enough to finance about 30,000 drones.

The sum is modest against Ukraine’s stated annual defense requirement of $120 billion.

However, supporters argue the industry is already generating taxable income while operating under laws that expose creators to criminal prosecution.

A bill co-authored by Zhelezniak passed its first parliamentary vote in July and is awaiting a second reading.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    Why did they ban porn in the first place?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Same reason the US is having problems with conservatives wanting to ban drag shows and have everyone to give all their information to third party companies for age verification. Their imaginary sky daddy told them to be an angry asshole to everyone having fun or minding their own business.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 56 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Because Ukraine was once a very conservative country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Being part of a Soviet Union would do that, unfortunately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Porn ban started in 2001.

    Probably anti-russian/pro-west backlash, tbh. Lot of pro-jesus laws passed around the world as a way to reject the USSR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Also likely wanting to curtail sex work in general, as Westerners were going to former Soviet countries for sex tourism.

    In fact, right after Russia invaded Ukraine, “Ukrainian women” became a top 10 pornhub search.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Well yeah, anything that's in the news is gonna end up on a porn site. Its like how trans porn trends in right wing states: it's not cause right wing states are secretly horny for trans people, it's just that a certain percentage of people treat pornhub like google. Just so happens that Fox News talks about trans folks a lot. Talked about Ukraine a lot back then too.

    Curtailing sex work in general, yes. Lots of conservative Orthodox folks over there. Russia too. They're basically the same people. That border used to feel like Schengen before Schengen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I have no idea how it is these days, but in the 90s there was a lot of trafficking going on in eastern Europe. Curtailing sex work in general might've been seen as a necessary evil to reduce that. Make your country as boring as possible to predators.

    But yes, true on the conservative Orthodox folks too.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Lmao, gooners will bring the demise of Russia. What a timeline to live in.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Legalize sex work, tax corporations.

  • source
  • [+] -100 points 2 months ago (25 children)

    The local 'OF stardom' won't register, or will just move abroad. The practice of their craft is not bound to any single location.

    Ukraine is not a serious country, nor are it's leaders serious people.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    Ukraine is not a serious country, nor are it's leaders serious people.

    Classic .ml moment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 2 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (6 children)
  • [+] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I ctrl+f'd "world"

    .ml is broadly incapable of not insulting world on a regular basis, so it was a pretty easy bet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 2 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I was talking about ml as a whole, in a general sense. Not you specifically. But fine.

    Calling it reddit.world is basically the same shit you said a month ago, so pretending you don't instance shame anymore while still doing it is pretty cringe.

    Also nitpicking people while (deliberately?) misunderstanding their comments is very much like ml, so there's another generalization you fit perfectly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    You seem to have made a conscious choice to join and stay on .ml. you're more than welcome to do that but don't be surprised when people react negatively to some of your other server members' tankie comments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 months ago* (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Shitting on Ukraine on behalf of daddy vlad is tankie behavior 101. So in this case it is indeed a .ml user performing tankie semaphore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    The local 'OF stardom' is currently technically breaking the law. This would legalize what they're doing and tax it as legal income. Worst case scenario, nobody registers their income, nothing happens. Best case scenario, a bunch of them will register their income because that means they can do their business 100% legally whereas before it was illegal anyway so why bother reporting it for taxes.

    There's very little, if any, potential downside for making porn legal if it's already being produced and already available... like it is in most other countries. There's some potential upside, even though it remains to be seen how much will actually be realized. It's a nobrainer to do this IMO.

    Most countries tax income regardless of source so moving abroad won't make your OF account untaxed magically. And hiding your income is always a risk in most countries, unless you have a day job or something to explain your ability to pay for your expenses.

  • source
  • parent