It's not about the court's enforcement, it's about responsibility

Every organization out there preserves itself. It's why we have legal and HR departments. They don't exist to protect their people, they exist to protect the organization

If a police department was caught wildly misusing unconstitutional searches, every case they tried in that period is opened to that exposure. That's not just a huge embarrassment, it's a massive amount of work that will tie up the local justice system for a significant period

That's the kind of damage that can kill a police department wholesale, or at least cleanly sweep away all the leadership

The organization will protect itself against this kind of thing, not out of the goodness of their hearts, but because organizations must preserve themselves or fade away. They'll put in checks that will leave an audit trail and/or require a document ID to use such a system, because that's what it takes to protect the organization. They'll offload the responsibility onto the officers, and enforce the rules (even if just a slap on the wrist). That's simply how organizations act, descriptively

I'm not saying that police in charge would be better, so much as this situation is so much worse. No one has responsibility here. The private company is not limited by the Constitution, and the police are just using a subscription to a commercial service

No one has to take responsibility if this turns into an issue. It's the same as consulting companies and AI rejections - the primary purpose is to make it so when someone creates manmade horrors beyond comprehension, no one is responsible