should i give up the idea because i can't create it without AI?
Yes.
should i give up the idea because i can't create it without AI?
Yes.
You could have drawn this in MS Paint and I would have upvoted it, instead you get nothing.

You wouldn't be able to catch the references tho, only if you were a good artist you could catch the references but as an amateur you cant do that. Its just more powerful than you can create with the idea.. Seriously you spend hours recreating this picture to prove a point.
You can literally just label everything you can't draw with words and it would be the more likeable and moral approach. The AI isn't fun to look at. The AI actively disgusts us.
I get it but surely there should be some exceptions.
The expectation is that you don't use AI.
It's not even my expectation. But it's the main one, and very clearly established and communicated.
Why not just do a shitty photoshop? Like, seriously, it's way funnier if it's shitty photoshop
How would you photoshop that seriously?
Take a stock image of a carousel and photos of the people on it. Clip their faces or whole bodies (it doesn't have to be neat or perfect) and arrange them on the horses.
How much carbon got released for this stupid fucking bullshit? Cunts like you will burn the world down for the sake of being a dumb piece of shit.
You people are limiting the freedom of expression and artistic freedom in the name of AI hate.
Stick figures are more creative.
Keep your AI tools to sort data tables and shit but let us do the creating.
Downvotes are also free expression.
AI companies are literally stealing copyright material for their models. Where does the artist's copyright of their own works end and your "freedom of expression" begin?
This is a question we should ask.
No we're not. You're not entitled to our attention.
You can do whatever you want. I think the message is clear that there is limited support for AI here. So if you choose that as your "medium" it may meet with limited traction.
all 32 comments