all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 2 months ago

The text on the foreground victim figure says "Lebanon" in Korean. For info.

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Good job someone added the flags otherwise the subtle satire would have been lost on me

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    well because just having the nose would be racist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Looks like the original didn’t have the flags. Just the nose. Kind of a fucked up cartoon actually; probably shouldn’t promoting this one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    I haven't found any "original" of this image. However, it was seemingly drawn by Carlos Latuff. The nose trope is not uniform across his work, nor is it only depicting jews this way.

    Basically the same image created a year after this one went viral and presumably by the same artist.

    The Korean "Lebanon" on the victim is an edit spread among Koreans discussing the war which is where it went viral and so explains why it's otherwise difficult to find.. I haven't found any earlier (july 2016), but it's confirmed non original as intended, which is obvious since Carlos is Brazilian.

    Additional examples: https://mondoweiss.net/author/carlos-latuff/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago

    The eagerness from bad actors to assume these depictions are about Jews broadly warrants some level of specificity in symbolism. It is the most direct symbol of Israel, not the star of David. It is the most direct symbol of Nazi Germany, not the Buddhist swastika.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Hurt people will hurt people...

    The abused will become the abuser.

  • source