How the hell does anyone look at the state of far-right politics globally and think 'I want that for my country'?
post
France, please be smart.
I thought they found her guilty of something and barred her from running for office. Or am I thinking of another French politician?
She was found guilty of embezzlement of public funds, one of the worse crime for a politician. She was condemned to ineligiblity to run for office but she filled an appeal.
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/31/g-s1-57262/france-marine-le-pen-embezzlement-verdict
She was found guilt which if I remember correctly prevented her from running in the municipal elections (which she wasn't planning to run for anyways) but she can still run for president. she also has to wear an electronic bracelet to track her, she said she would not run for president with it and has tried to appeal the decision, if the court finds she has to wear it, Jordan Bardella the new president of her party (RN) will most likely run in her place
I've been telling Europeans this!
Not in a "I told you so" way, more of a cold bucket of water in the face. There's this attitude like there's no way a set of Trumplikes could win power in Germany, France, Sweden, Swizerland, the Nordic countries and such like they did in the US, but its already happening!
Its exactly what Americans thought right up until the instant he won, and didnt go away.
Ironically this is what has been exasperating me about Canada lately (as someone from US), unlike the US and Europe, Canada saw Trump get elected and then actually did wake the fuck up and they turned around and elected Carney instead of Polievre.... but now it doesn't really feel like maybe much of Canada understands that they just pulled the handbrake and powerslided narrowly out of a catastrophe... and Carney isn't in any sense an alternative or a solution, but rather a plug shoved into the dam.
I say the above statements with the caveat that I know that many Canadians know this, I just see Carney getting contextualized as if he really was what Canada needed or wanted in the moment, he was the best alternative! Remember that!!!! Don't let the media turn him into a hero if he doesn't actually back up his bold speeches with bold progressive actions.
The really dangerous thing in my opinion here is when centrist status quo managers begin to lose a belief that if they screw over the average person enough they will turn on not just the people shittier than them (conservatives spouting violent and racist rhetoric), but them too. This is the opening all extremist, rightwing and violent movements exploit.
Ultimately this is a story as old as time right? The wealthy elite jam up systematic change and squeeze the structures that sustain them until one awful day a breaking point is reached and people decide they want everything to burn damn it all, at which point the wealthy elite point at the coming wall of fire and say incredulously "Why!!? This burns down the homes of the poor people and good elites too!!? That is irrational!" right before they are swallowed in the firestorm.
The kinds of people like Carney and Biden sleepwalked us up to this brink of collapse in fascism, which doesn't make them worse than fascists, it just makes them the necessary precursor to fascism, like how you have to dig a hole to plant a tree...
There are only two choices, embrace bold, hopeful policies and visions that address the suffering in people that causes that desire to burn everything down, or wait until your society becomes so brittle and weak that it shatters into violence and chaos. There is no "Third Way".
Carney was also in the exact right place at the right time, no? A central banker already in the race when a trade crisis erupts; you can't make that stuff up.
but now it doesn’t really feel like Canada understands that they just pulled the handbrake and powerslided narrowly out of a catastrophe… and Carney isn’t in any sense an alternative or a solution, but rather a plug shoved into the dam.
Unfortunately, voters dont think very long term, in aggregate. We just have to hope the short term aligns with the long.
...when centrist status quo managers begin to lose a belief that if they screw over the average person enough they will turn on not just the people shittier than them (conservatives spouting violent and racist rhetoric), but them too. This is the opening all extremist, rightwing and violent movements exploit.
And their supporters, too. I distinctly remember all the hand-wringing from fiscal conservatives in the US that co-opted the far-right forever... they are all but extinct, now.
I'm afraid Europe isnt in such a "fortuitous" crisis though. The countries mostly dont have economic apocalypse and annexation hanging over their head, nor an obvious "solution" like Carney, excepting the countries near Russia and Ukraine (who seem to have woken up).
The thing that totally breaks my brain about European conservatives is how blatantingly they support russia, parts of the German military are wildly concerning for how sympathetic they are to russia and Putin, and yet the public attention of Europe is held firm with a leather glove on fearmongering about desperate immigrants goaded into tragic political stunts and how Europe needs to give tons of money to fascist rightwing leaders to be tough enough to fight russia... and how societies have to close themselves down and engage in cultural and geographic isolationism to protect themselves... when the opposite is desperately true.
What European conservatives want is the same as russia wants ultimately, which is for the movement of the poor and working class to be heavily restricted between countries while the flow of goods, money and power in the hands of the rich are given absolute freedom.
Swizerland
I don't think that's news here. Before Trump became relevant we've had Christoph Blocher already, who is pretty Trump-like (right wing populist using racist anti-immigration rhetoric).
Luckily we don't have a presidential system, nor one with a prime minister, so the highest he could and did reach was just being part of the seven person executive council.
That council is elected by parliament, which did not confirm him for a second term. He was in it from 2004-2007 (our executive council terms align with calendar years).
PS: It's Switzerland, with a t
Always good to check who did the poll, who commissioned it and what are the significant numbers.
Published on Monday and conducted by Toluna Harris Interactive for French broadcasters RTL and M6, the poll predicts Le Pen to win and be at least 16 points ahead of any other candidate.
The poll, which surveyed 1,764 people registered to vote in France aged 18 or over
I don't know about Toluna Harris Interactive, I can't judge their seriousness and neutrality. RTL, is a radio with a political alignment to the right. 1764 people answer the poll, when the number of registered voters in France is just shy of 50 millions.
Polls like this are massively utilized as a campaigning tool. They are used as "neutral facts" dictating the outcome of the election, when they rarely are. In the past few major elections in France, countless polls have given RN or Marine LePen as the winners. They still haven't won.
Let's not forget that Marine LePen and many of her associates have been found guilty of corruption and stealing 2.8 million Euros from the EU, in 2 separate courts of law. This also has an impact on her voters-base.
1764 people answer the poll, when the number of registered voters in France is just shy of 50 millions
That in itself doesn't invalidate the poll. There are standard statistical methods for figuring out how many people you need to ask to get a representative sample and it can be a lot less than one might imagine. But whether people were really chosen in an unbiased way is another question. A good survey will publish its methodology.
How much help is she getting from Musk/Trump/Putin/Xi/Kim?
People in the left, for some reason, tend to forget the fact that while they don't vote because no left-wing party is good enough, an army of intellectually challenged, propaganda ridden right wing voters are going to vote for anyone the right-wing powers that be decide to put in place, no matter how stupid, horrible, psychopath that person (and the whole organization behind them) is.
People in the left, for some reason, tend to forget the fact that while they don’t vote because no left-wing party is good enough
Where is your evidence of this?
That whenever people mobilize to vote, the more people go to vote, more votes go to the left. This and the fact that the most evident message fed to the masses is "voting is useless, all parties/politicians are the same."
I wish someone would just assassinate these far right individuals. The people are obviously too stupid or hateful to stop them, so it falls on the benevolent few I suppose who can find an opportunity to strike.
Maybe we just need another pandemic to cull the herd of some more of the idiots.
Far better if these scumbags end up dead while doing erotic asphyxiation and having a giant dildo on their asses, all recorded and live steam.
You fool, martyring these incompetent rightwing fascists is the only thing that could allow the far right to craft a true hero.
They need you to play the part, so then they can step in and convince everyone else to stomp you brutally down with the boot.
None of the leaders of the far right parties can govern.. ANYWHERE ON EARTH, which doesn't mean that far right parties aren't wielding immense power all over the world but NONE of their leaders are competent at it, and the way forward to fighting that is turning a mirror on the leaders of these parties not as a way to distract from the evil of the far right parties backing them but rather to make the point that every far right leader is the same hateful idiot with the same failed plan.
Fascism is the height of incompetence but nothing hides incompetence better than violence.
I’m fine if they want to be a martyr. I haven’t heard Charlie Kirk spread any of his hatred recently. Kinetic solutions seem to be working.
If that was your take away from Charlie Kirk, you have a very warped and distorted view of reality.
Charlie Kirk immediately became a platform to test the whole rainbow of artillery barrages the far right has ready for when/if there is a "genuinely leftwing" attack.
It is pathetic that you think it is cowardly and ineffective not to desire pointless violence on the figureheads of fascist movements when you don't realize you are just screaming at everyone to charge headfirst into the beartrap with you.
Take your calls for violence elsewhere.
Tolerance of fascists and allowing them to live has resulted in them festering and gaining more and more power. I think we should change tactics because the live and let live/debate them instead approach hasn’t been working and, if anything, has allowed them to undo decades of progress. I’d rather we finally try out John Brown’s approach.
Yeah I'd take this poll with a big pinch of salt. The french electorate is very divided, split 1/3 each between Left, Right and Centre. No candidate is going to win the 1st round, and the 2nd round is quite different from the 1st.
In the 1st voters vote for who they want, but in the 2nd many voters are voting against the candidate the hate the most. If Le Pen comes first in the first round, it's really all about who she's facing. If it's Melenchon then things will be unpredictable as it'll come down to who the centrists vote for - and there are plenty on the right who would never vote for Melenchon. However if shes against a centrist, then she's more likely to lose even if they're deeply unpopular now, because they're the easier "anyone but Le Pen".
The outcome of the election is very unpredictable; no one is going to give any idea of what the outcome might be until closer to the election in April and even then it'll probably be down to the wire.
If it’s Melenchon then things will be unpredictable as it’ll come down to who the centrists vote for - and there are plenty on the right who would never vote for Melenchon. However if shes against a centrist, then she’s more likely to lose even if they’re deeply unpopular now, because they’re the easier “anyone but Le Pen”.
Where is the evidence of this? This assumption proved catastrophic in US elections, Biden was an awful choice to run against Trump and so was Harris.
Polling data. In head-to-head matchups Melenchon does worst against Le Pen (and it's not close, two-thirds would vote for Le Pen over Melenchon).
A candidate who needs to win against a far-right candidate needs to not alienate either centrists or the left. That means a strong core message focused on issues rather than ideology or radicalism. Biden/Harris didn't have a strong core message and alienated voters on the left, Melenchon is far too much of an idealogue and radical so he's alienated the centrists. A lot of centrist voters prefer Le Pen to Melenchon because Melenchon turned them away, not because Le Pen was so attractive.
all 46 comments