The US military has resumed its campaign of bombing alleged drug-trafficking vessels after a two-month pause in a campaign that many legal experts and human rights groups believe constitutes a murder spree.

In a Monday social media post, US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) said it carried out a "lethal kinetic strike on a low-profile vessel operating along established narco-trafficking routes" in the Pacific Ocean on Sunday. Two people were killed as a result of the attack, SOUTHCOM claimed.

In announcing the strike, SOUTHCOM Commander Gen. Francis Donovan said the attack was part of a campaign of "imposing total systemic friction on narco-terrorists—disrupting their operations, dismantling their leadership, and eliminating cartel terror across the region."

Donovan's boasts about the effectiveness of the boat strikes in combating the drug trade come less than a month after a leaked a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) analysis revealed that the boat-bombing campaign has not "reduced the amount of cocaine entering” the country, as drug cartels have found alternate methods for shipping their product into the US.

With the latest two casualties, the boat bombing campaign launched nearly a year ago by President Donald Trump's administration has now claimed the lives of at least 223 people.

Adam Isaacson, director of the Defense Oversight program at the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), criticized the administration for resuming its boat bombings despite "overwhelming evidence that they are murder; that many, likely most, of the dead are either super-low-level or uninvolved with drugs; and that cocaine supply is unaffected."

Brian Finucane, senior adviser to the US Program at the International Crisis Group, delivered a similarly scathing assessment, commenting that "the Trump administration's lawless killing spree at sea resumes."

Nicholas Grossman, professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, described the boat strike campaign as "murderous" and "illegal," adding that its victims are "not terrorists" and "may not even be drug traffickers."

Investigative journalist Camila Lourdes Galarza observed that "there’s still no proof any of the victims" of the boat strikes were involved in the drug trade.

Lourdes Galarza sarcastically added that if the victims had been drug traffickers, "the US would probably give them a deal" like the one given to Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras who was pardoned by Trump last year despite being previously convicted on narcotics trafficking charges.


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 2 months ago

Fresh murder for the week with a side of corruption. They can't stop because they are monsters.

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 18 points 2 months ago

    “We can’t win in Iran so we’ll murder some fishermen.”

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    "Now please stop asking us about Iran and Epstein..."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    “Over here! Look over here!” “Definitely don’t look over there!”

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I think they've been doing this for years at will.

    The question is, why are they are letting everybody know now? They know it won't impact the overall drug trade in any way, as the vast majority of that is in shipping containers, it's not on thousands of small fishing boats.

    Why would they want to reduce boat traffic in the Caribbean? Who is this for? Someone is making money off of this somehow, I just know it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment