all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

It kinda had to at some point right? DNA didn't exist until something other than DNA led to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    That's abiogenesis in a nutshell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Did somebody ever try to recreate the bion experiments? I'm pretty sure Reich is considered a quack nowadays, but makes sense to just observe things with a good enough microscope and patience, one could observe abiogenesis in some form

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    If you're aware of Reich you might already have heard of René Thom's theory of morphogenesis and how he modeled it. If not see below.

    https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/414350

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The result is an extraordinarily simple strand of DNA, consisting of the repeating sequence C-A-C-A

    💩🔬

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    I thought that image looked familiar, and indeed it is by the author of The Machinery of Life (maybe from the book itself but not directly attributed)

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Ok, fascinating, but why the repeating info in the article?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    life...uh..

  • source