A federal court in Manhattan last week ordered the public release of the files from Giuffre’s defamation lawsuit against the accomplice and partner of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein following eight years of litigation from the Miami Herald, reported Julie Brown, the investigative journalist for the newspaper best known for uncovering Epstein’s crimes.

Maxwell had been fighting to keep the lawsuit details under wraps, but her arguments were not enough to convince U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska, who ruled that the Epstein Files Transparency Act supersedes the grand jury arguments Maxwell cited to keep the records sealed.

Giuffre brought the lawsuit more than a decade ago after Maxwell accused her of lying about being abused by Epstein, Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and other powerful figures. The lawsuit’s discovery process yielded thousands of pages of documents, including depositions of Maxwell, Giuffre, and many others, and Brown was told that it contains more evidence against Epstein, Maxwell, and their accomplices.

The judge in the initial case, Robert Sweet, took the unusual step of sealing all of the documents because they contained “sensitive” and “private” information. He put a protective order on hearings and decisions made in the case as well as volumes of evidence reportedly proving that Epstein and Maxwell were running an underage sex trafficking ring.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
5 comments in c/Epsteinfiles@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Between this and Katie Phang'a lawsuit it seems the shoe is finally going to drop in the next few months

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • 5 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    Republicans: "We will release the files but we've removed individuals involved, some words, a few vowels and consonants.......and 26 characters of the alphabet. For security reasons."

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago*

    Yawn, let me know when it actually happens as opposed to blocked on appeal because Donnie

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Narrator: Or so they thought...

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I think Guiffre was killed by hacking into their vehicles to engineer a car accident. That's a thing now by the way, as incredible as it may seem that they would set up vehicles to be susceptible to being commandeered remotely.

    60 minutes did a thing on it some years back. On a hacker they paid to take control of a new car they bought and were using in an empty parking lot where the hacker took control, of acceleration and braking and steering and the rest.

  • source