134
Know the difference, as it may save your evening (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/tenforward@lemmy.world
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 2 months ago (5 children)

wPMGU4d62WMPUkZ.webp

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    lexx was such a weird and fantastic journey that opened my eyes to so many fetishes.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Missed opportunity: Star Trek: The Next Penetration.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
    • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Isn’t that the one where you put it on and go “wait hang the fuck on, that’s Tasha Yar, this isn’t just surface level, someone spent a surprising amount of effort making this lore-compliant and accurate to the characters”?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Am I the only one who is bothered by the poster for the porn parody showing a Picard that has pips on the wrong side of the collar up top and the correct side on the bottom? I’m gonna need an explanation for this before you even begin to convince me I need to see him and Crusher doing it on a biobed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 14 points 2 months ago

    I, too, noticed this inconsistency. The more probable answer: laziness in the face of a less than shoe string budget. They shot "Picard's" face with the shadow on the wrong side, but the "art department" decided to just mirror it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Somewhere there was a breakdown in communication. That "XXX" version was supposed to be based upon the Vin Diesel movie.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Makes me wonder if there's a XXX - A XXX Porn Parody. If so, it's probably still better than the original.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    The original is decent (for what it was). It’s the sequel what that was straight trash. I’m not saying xXx is a James Bond level of good but for some silly action flick, it does the job. The sequel misses the point that it was funny to laugh at xXx as a spy name because of the dude’s actual name. Writers or whoever thought they could get away with being a standalone sequel. Ice Cube does not told the hots that Diesel had.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    Mm-hmm...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I always had a thing for Michelle Forbes. She played a vampire in a movie called Love Bites, Lord have mercy...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Wow. Starring "Goody Two Shoes" Adam Ant. At a 5.4, still better than Section 31.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I love that movie. It's so early 90's.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    For a more 80's vibe, watch Once Bitten (1985), one of Jim Carrey's earliest.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    "Just" porn?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    wasnt beverlys sex ghost enough for ghost porn.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •