I don't think so (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
 
I don't think so

all 52 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 132 points 2 months ago (10 children)

I'm not entirely convinced that Google and Microsoft are Elrond in this particular issue .. or that uBlock Origin is the one ring .. it feels like this meme is something Sauron would push to make people think the good guys are bad guys ..

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Every story has two sides, and unfortunately the victor often writes the first history. However I do encourage reading the real LOTR story as told in the last ringbearer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Is this to LOTR as Wicked (not the stupid musical) is to Wizard of Oz?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Given that the author is a Kirill Yeskov, I think it's safe to say that it's fanfic, yes. Akin to Paradise Lost being the real story of the Bibble.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Fanfic is fine provided it's written well. I've never heard of Kirill Yeskov, but I like a good reimagining of a classic text.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    It's crazy anyone would willingly use Chrome and browse the internet without any protection. You'd be surprised though, as many of my friends don't even have an adblocker.

    In a way I guess it's good for people like us who just block them, as the ad watchers are essentially subsidizing services like YouTube who would otherwise crackdown harder on ad blockers.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Some people pay for youtube premium+ (or whatever it’s called) and try to be oh so smug about the quality of service they get. YT with no ads. If you pay for it. I’d rather just not use youtube.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I haven't yet met anyone who're so smug about paying yt premium, as vanced offer much much more. I paid it, have no complain, but i wouldn't be smug about it, that's just silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago*

    They're the same people who go "I'm fine with the raising prices. It's a valuable service to me and I make lots of money, so I'm fine with bending over for their shareholders."

    It's capitalism signaling for people with more money than values and ABSOLUTELY no sense of pattern recognition or consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    My brother and both of my parents will not stop talking about youtube premium with me. My brother is definitely smug about it. I’ve hit all the talking points: How easily ublock origin solves ads completely. How it’s a moral imperative to deprive Google of as much money as possible. How sending one month’s fee directly to the creator or buying their merch is infinitely more supportive.

    They’ve never rebuffed any of that and just kind of change the subject. And less than 24 hours later we’re back to a beamingly proud “I got YT premium man, I’m telling you it’s so worth it. You should get it!”

    I think next time I visit, the first time my brother brings it up (probably within an hour of arriving), I’m going to force him to acknowledge that we’ve had the conversation before. What YT Premium does to a mf, smh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    It’s weird to me, anyone using Edge or Chrome over Mozilla. It makes no sense. It’s not 1998 anymore. Surely people have had time to absorb the progression of things.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I think its convenience/ignorance. The general population isn't as tech savvy so they'll use whatever is popular/well known.

    Chrome is advertised as "the fastest browser" while edge comes with every single copy of Windows by default.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The only time I ever use a chromium based browser is because Firefox still doesn’t support WebSerial

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Edge is comfy. Simple as. I don't use chrome because it's too resource hungry (or was last time I used it), and I see no need to switch into firefox. Especially that I have, most probably hella outdated, bias against it from around the time chrome launched. Firefox was that messy weird browser nerds used, always full of tab and bars for some reason (ones that weren't the effect of a virus).

    When Edge goes with manifest update, I am aiming at Floorp.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago

    swap ublock with ads, chrome/edge with firefox/ublock then it fits the format more

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    What a weird meme considering how the story went from there

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    MOZILLDUR!!!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago
    [–] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Mozilla will get rid of uBlock, don't you worry. They love Goofle way too much.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    They'll get offered ad revenue sharing and it'll be too good to pass up.

    They certainly have no ideological problem with following suit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Once a proper alternative pops up, Mozilla is done for. They'll have lived long enough to become the villain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago
    [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Doesn't this mean that web developers will just stop developing their sites to be compatible with anything other than chrome derivatives?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Already happened. Same shit with people writing for IE over netscape or early Firefox

    With the rise of tablets and smartphones a lot of those devs got rude awakenings. Then Apps and Chrome happened and they disappeared back up their own arses

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    I don't believe in any solution

    You get a new android shit stiik is called Shizukui was trying to convey that shit is crazy

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    OP must be a tech CEO.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago

    Please stop

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago

    You can't deploy this. The anti cyclists will notice, and fuck them

  • source