I'm not entirely convinced that Google and Microsoft are Elrond in this particular issue .. or that uBlock Origin is the one ring .. it feels like this meme is something Sauron would push to make people think the good guys are bad guys ..
post
It's crazy anyone would willingly use Chrome and browse the internet without any protection. You'd be surprised though, as many of my friends don't even have an adblocker.
In a way I guess it's good for people like us who just block them, as the ad watchers are essentially subsidizing services like YouTube who would otherwise crackdown harder on ad blockers.
Some people pay for youtube premium+ (or whatever it’s called) and try to be oh so smug about the quality of service they get. YT with no ads. If you pay for it. I’d rather just not use youtube.
I haven't yet met anyone who're so smug about paying yt premium, as vanced offer much much more. I paid it, have no complain, but i wouldn't be smug about it, that's just silly.
They're the same people who go "I'm fine with the raising prices. It's a valuable service to me and I make lots of money, so I'm fine with bending over for their shareholders."
It's capitalism signaling for people with more money than values and ABSOLUTELY no sense of pattern recognition or consequences.
My brother and both of my parents will not stop talking about youtube premium with me. My brother is definitely smug about it. I’ve hit all the talking points: How easily ublock origin solves ads completely. How it’s a moral imperative to deprive Google of as much money as possible. How sending one month’s fee directly to the creator or buying their merch is infinitely more supportive.
They’ve never rebuffed any of that and just kind of change the subject. And less than 24 hours later we’re back to a beamingly proud “I got YT premium man, I’m telling you it’s so worth it. You should get it!”
I think next time I visit, the first time my brother brings it up (probably within an hour of arriving), I’m going to force him to acknowledge that we’ve had the conversation before. What YT Premium does to a mf, smh.
My entire IT team just uses chrome because it's what comes on our work machines.
It’s weird to me, anyone using Edge or Chrome over Mozilla. It makes no sense. It’s not 1998 anymore. Surely people have had time to absorb the progression of things.
I keep chromium installed for the few times a year I visit a page that doesn't support Firefox.
I think its convenience/ignorance. The general population isn't as tech savvy so they'll use whatever is popular/well known.
Chrome is advertised as "the fastest browser" while edge comes with every single copy of Windows by default.
The only time I ever use a chromium based browser is because Firefox still doesn’t support WebSerial
Firefox added web serial support recently (a couple of version points back) so you should now be able to avoid chromium for that use case too.
I have to use chrome and edge for work. I was specifically told we aren't approved to install Firefox..
Chrome is convenient for getting into gmail but that's about it.
Edge is comfy. Simple as. I don't use chrome because it's too resource hungry (or was last time I used it), and I see no need to switch into firefox. Especially that I have, most probably hella outdated, bias against it from around the time chrome launched. Firefox was that messy weird browser nerds used, always full of tab and bars for some reason (ones that weren't the effect of a virus).
When Edge goes with manifest update, I am aiming at Floorp.
swap ublock with ads, chrome/edge with firefox/ublock then it fits the format more
Mozilla will get rid of uBlock, don't you worry. They love Goofle way too much.
They'll get offered ad revenue sharing and it'll be too good to pass up.
They certainly have no ideological problem with following suit.
Once a proper alternative pops up, Mozilla is done for. They'll have lived long enough to become the villain.
Doesn't this mean that web developers will just stop developing their sites to be compatible with anything other than chrome derivatives?
That's already the case to some extent.
But if Firefox is the only browser where real adblocking happens, I imagine anti-adblocking will become less aggressive, which will be great news for Firefox users.
Even though Vivaldi is chromium-based, some site just don't function properly or even refuse to load, but working fine in chrome, so yeah it's already happened.
You say this like web developers don't have bosses.
Are there folks freelancing as web devs out there? Sure. Is that the majority of the web we use? Absolutely not.
Already happened. Same shit with people writing for IE over netscape or early Firefox
With the rise of tablets and smartphones a lot of those devs got rude awakenings. Then Apps and Chrome happened and they disappeared back up their own arses
I don't believe in any solution
You get a new android shit stiik is called Shizukui was trying to convey that shit is crazy


all 52 comments