all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 34 points 2 months ago (1 child)

In any other situation doing something to someone without asking because they’d say “no” would be a crime.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago

    We decided to just trick people into accepting it because it was a lot easier than trying to explain how it's in their best interest, since it isn't.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Every European which user should now use its GDPR rights and ask them what data they have of us and what they do with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    By the time you are livestreaming on twitch one would assume all caution regarding feeding the beast has long left the room and few fucks will be given.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] [S] 26 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    unfortunately feeding the beast was normalized long ago

    there was some resistance in the early 2000's but we got lazy and want cheap flights, easy ways to pay for shit and real time maps so gave it all up for lolz

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    No, "convenience" isn't the problem: Enshittification isn't caused by "lazy consumers."

    Using Amazon, or Twitter, or Facebook, or Google, or Doordash, or Uber doesn't make you lazy. Platform capitalism isn't enshittifying because you made the wrong shopping choices.

    …

    When [we] blame corporate power on "laziness," we buy into the corporations' own story about how they came to dominate our lives: we just prefer them. This is how Google explains away its 90% market-share in search: we just chose Google. But we didn't, not really – Google spends tens of billions of dollars every single year buying up the search-box on every website, phone, and operating system:

    https://pluralistic.net/2024/02/21/im-feeling-unlucky/#not-up-to-the-task

    Blaming "laziness" for corporate dominance also buys into the monopolists' claim that the only way to have convenient, easy-to-use services is to cede power to them. Facebook claims it's literally impossible for you to carry on social relations with the people that matter to you without also letting them spy on you. When we criticize people for wanting to hang out online with the people they love, we send the message that they need to choose loneliness and isolation, or they will be complicit in monopoly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Corey's entertaining on the evangelical circuit but I'd be wary of reading those kinda shitposts as Gospels.

    Laziness still a factor methinks and people are often not that stupid ime, they know exactly what they are doing when they outsource social networking to meta or shopping to Jeff.

    We've been outsourcing effort since the oldowan and things got really bad in wake of writing, this is not new.

    The twitch thing seems a bit absurd where if streamers don't consent the poor LLM's will need to actually watch the drivel they are openly streaming for attention instead of getting it via API which will just waste more cpu cycles for lolz.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Luckily, we're not just "consumers." We're also citizenswho can exercise political power. That's hard work – but so is organizing a co-op or a boycott. The difference is, when we dog enforcers who wield the power of the state, and line up behind them when they start to do their jobs, we can make deep structural differences that go far beyond anything we can make happen as consumers:

    https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/18/administrative-competence/#i-know-stuff

    We're not just "consumers" or "citizens" – we're also workers, and when workers come together in unions, they, too, can concentrate the diffuse, atomized power of the individual into a single, powerful entity that can hold the forces of capital in check:

    https://pluralistic.net/2024/04/10/an-injury-to-one/#is-an-injury-to-all

    And all of these things work together; when regulators do their jobs, they protect workers who are unionizing:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/06/goons-ginks-and-company-finks/#if-blood-be-the-price-of-your-cursed-wealth

    And strong labor power can force cartels to abandon their plans to rig the market so that every consumer choice makes them more powerful:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/01/how-the-writers-guild-sunk-ais-ship/

    And when consumers can choose better, local, more ethical businesses at competitive rates, those choices can make a difference:

    https://pluralistic.net/2022/07/10/view-a-sku/

    Antimonopoly policy is the foundation for all forms of people-power. The very instant corporations become too big to fail, jail or care is the instant that "voting with your wallet" becomes a waste of time.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    At least they're being honest about it. 99% of the companies training AI or selling people's data to AI companies are doing so without telling anyone.

    Having said that, Twitch streams are public almost all of the time so complaining that they're being used in ways the creator never intended is a bit like complaining that someone caught you picking your nose in public.

    We learned this lesson in the 90s: Once something goes public on the Internet, it is no longer under the creator's/publisher's control. People can and will do whatever TF they want with it. As long as they're not redistributing it without permission, that is legal.

    It's everyone's right to do whatever TF they want with the stuff that's literally sent to their computer on purpose. That includes using that thing to train AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    It's everyone's right to do whatever TF they want with the stuff that's literally sent to their computer on purpose. That includes using that thing to train AI.

    Exactly. As long as they don’t sell it or anything directly derived from it for profit afterwards. Else that would be copyright infringement, as has been tested in court thousands of times.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    tiktok does this, reddit does this.
    discord says they wont sell your data, but doesnt say wether they use it to train their own AI

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/technology@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 16 points 2 months ago

    AND WHY DO YOU THINK NOBODY WOULD OPT-IN, ASSHOLES?

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago*

    Damn, imagine if I could give to every store an opt-out form, that if they didn't sign and return the form for me, I could take an item from their store every year as a birthday gift. If it was opt-in, nobody would opt-in in that case too...

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    Capitalism is just so damn full of FREEDOM isn't it?

  • source