all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 3 months ago

A new offence? A public spec’s offender? Bring it on!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Can someone explain to me why so many people want these glasses? They can't all be pervy or malicious, surely...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Are these actually smart glasses, or just glasses with a camera in them? Because that is not the same thing. We've had glasses with cameras in them for like 20 years. They can be great for recording a ride or run, for example.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    They appear to have some smart features, the kmart website includes these on the description:

    • Bluetooth connectivity for music and hands-free calls
    • Smart touch controls and buttons
    • Image recognition and chat features via the HeyCyan companion app

    The last point is most relevant, I'm guessing that means it can do things like attempt to identify stuff you're looking at. I wouldn't have high hopes for the software being well coded or supported for any length of time though...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    We’re suddenly supposed to care about the privacy implications because it’s probably sending to Xi instead of a US oligarch.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Are they hackable? It would be great to de-cloud them and run my ouw software.

  • source
  • 29 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The backlash isn't as powerful as the drive to monetize another accessory and the hundreds of billions of dollars to make it happen.

    Without any kind of privacy laws making this kind of thing illegal, every company would want that kind of mass data and will gladly give you the glasses in order to take it from you.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 3 months ago

    The backlash isn’t as powerful as the drive to monetize another accessory

    Yah you're prob right. I always wish ppl just wouldn't buy these, or rings, or w/e. So co's would learn that it's a guaranteed financial loss, to bring them to market.

    But I know that's a pipe dream. Sigh.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Been a while since I seen a Kmart. Lol.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Didn't believe it myself, but still very big in OZ.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    I did visit the Kmart in Miami last month! :p There are still three Kmart stores and five Sears stores open in the US.

    Sears:

    • Braintree, MA (Boston)
    • Concord, CA (San Francisco)
    • Coral Gables, FL (Miami)
    • El Paso, TX
    • Orlando, FL

    Kmart:

    • Kendale Lakes, FL (Miami)
    • Saint Thomas, USVI
    • Tamuning, Guam
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Huh. You travel a lot and or have a good eye. Just about every one I have ever known or any old building is long gone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Nah I just happen to live near the Concord location and visited all the Florida locations when I went on vacation there. The list is just public knowledge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    You... Seek out kmarts in Florida?

    I don't. Remember them doing anything well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Wait, hold the fuck on a second..... Australia still has K-Mart?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Low cost pervert glasses.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Oops didnt mean to! /$

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    I don't see a problem with these thing. You could achieve the same by wearing a GoPro on your head. The problem comes in when all of the footage is automatically uploaded to a malicious company like Meta.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    You understand this is a perverse foot in the door, right? When people become accustomed to the idea, of their every conversation possibly being recorded (for whatever reason), the follow-up step is bound to be cloud connectivity: with limited on-device storage and lack of redundancy (back-ups), cloud will naturally serve as the "convenient" solution for both of these self-created "problems". Problem-reaction-solution, always.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    People are already accustomed to being recorded in public. The "follow-up step" has nothing to do with local recording devices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    To some degree, but at least when it happens it's quite a bit more transparent and explicit. With the average consumer knowingly, or unknowingly, storing their smartphone's contents with a non end-to-end encrypted cloud provider, the recordings from this smartphone-connected device synced to it, will also become cloud accessible. So there's nothing inherently local about these devices, at least not in the hands of the average consumer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You could achieve the same by wearing a GoPro on your head.

    But a gopro on the head, or a phone held up to record, is much more conspicuous. These smart glasses are made for ppl to record their life 24/7. That automaticlaly means, other ppl's lives will be recorded by that person. Without their knowledge.

    It is also bad with a gopro or a phone, ofc. But smart glasses make the prob even worse. That doesn't even get into the uses these will be put, creeping on women at beaches or w/e. If you go holding up a phone to creep somebody, there is social pressure to stop being an ass. You may even be asked to leave the venue. But when it is unobtrusive with smart glasses, the social pressure erodes b/c people don't even know.

    I agree automatic upload is a prob. But even if it's local, the mere fact of walking around recording everything you see, means other ppl's worst moments are going to feature in tiktoks a LOT more often. And much more clickbait content made at the expense of ppl who don't even know they are being recorded, trying to make them look bad for the content. I agree, that happens already in other ways. But that doesn't mean we should want to see the prob get even worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I do 100% agree with the backlash of these cameras.

    I also think that the general public should be just as weary of every front door having a ring camera, or every side yard having a blink camera.

    While glasses are less conspicuous in public, these neighborhood cameras are already everywhere. You can’t take a walk at night without being on 20 different cameras. (While these cameras aren’t being used to be creepy) their footage is still going to a server where employees are doing whatever they want with them.

    We gave up our privacy for convenience a long time ago. Meta glasses are the least of our worries if Palantir has anything to say about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Remember when people were talking about smart watches listening to you all the time? Nobody worries about that anymore. Instead, pretty much everyone wears a smart watch of some sort. My guess is, the same will happen with smart glasses eventually.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    >ᛒ 📹

    I knew Aussies were into kinky stuff, but I didn't know you were THAT open with others!

  • source
  • [+] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)