Just over a year ago, David Hogg, then the newly-minted vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, found himself unceremoniously pushed out after he called on the party to back primary challengers to unseat members of a moribund establishment.

Now, as progressives notch victory after victory against the party's conservative old guard and are once again galvanizing young voters thought to have been lost, the 26-year-old reformer says it proves he was right all along.

"A year ago, I was removed from my position as vice chair of the DNC for daring to suggest that we needed to challenge geriatric, corrupt, and asleep-at-the-wheel Democrats in safe blue seats," Hogg wrote in an op-ed for Zeteo on Thursday. "The establishment kicked me out for those 'radical' views, and the establishment is losing."

His missive came days after yet another triumph for the left in Michigan, where the progressive Dr. Abdul El-Sayed overcame more than $60 million in outside spending in the Senate primary, more than half of which came from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), to upset a candidate backed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and other leading figures in the party establishment.

Hogg—a survivor of the 2018 Parkland school shooting who co-founded the gun control advocacy group March for Our Lives— noted El-Sayed's victory as one of the latest in a "hot streak" for the organization he formed in 2023 and has continued to lead after being forced out of the DNC.

The group, known as Leaders We Deserve, is predominantly funded by small-dollar donors and has boosted young progressives to challenge the party status quo, running on policies like Medicare for All, increased taxes on the rich, expanding public services, and an end to aggressive foreign interventions and military funding for Israel.

The group was a major outside supporter of a super PAC that helped fuel democratic socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani's unexpected ascent in New York City last year.

It has also backed a number of progressive challengers who've gone on to defeat well-funded, establishment-backed candidates this cycle, including community activist Donavan McKinney in Michigan, labor organizer Claire Valdez in New York, and professor Randy Villegas in California, who've each claimed Democratic nominations for the US House.

Hogg wrote that state-level candidates backed by his organization have an 18-1 record in their races this cycle.

He argued that the success of these candidates served as a counterpoint to the conventional wisdom following the party's losses in 2024, that Democrats needed to chase young voters to the right after they opted in unexpectedly huge numbers for President Donald Trump.

"As we saw in Mamdani’s race, and in races with progressive candidates across the country," Hogg said, "young voters are turning out in record numbers, proving that we didn’t lose Gen Z; they just needed candidates to vote for."

And contrary to the establishment's fearmongering about "electability," Hogg said the left's recent wins show that "progressives aren’t just electable; they’re a dominant force."

"Voters see clearly that many of our politicians are serving their largest corporate donors instead of the working class. Younger voters cannot fathom voting for a status quo that has never served them," he said. "It turns out that a focused affordability message, moral clarity, and a commitment to not being bought motivates voters across the political spectrum."

"A year ago, cable news pundit panels, elected officials, campaign strategists, and the entire establishment told me I was crazy for daring to challenge our party to do better," Hogg said. "Today, I say: I wasn’t wrong; I was just early."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 3 months ago

We need to abolish the dnc. They are not democratic and only serve the people that finance them. They would rather have republicans get elected than have citizens vote for progress.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    Still not wrong

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    So fucked up when they pushed him out. The man deserves his "I told you so" moment.

  • source
  • 31 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 31 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    I wish moderate libs would understand that the demsocs are helping to move the Overton window further left, which is a good thing because it's moved way too far to the right due to the ratchet effect. I mean, Jesus, do libs not know how to negotiate? You know compromise will be necessary, so start left of the position you want to end up at. You start at democratic socialism but you end up at a relatively modest, European style social democracy. If that's too far left for you, well, you might as well just cut the crap and join the Republican party now.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    2020s Democrats are mostly 1980s Republicans that are more okay with diversity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The second half of this statement is debatable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    As someone who lived in the 80s, it isn't debatable. A gay person outside of highly liberal cities, had to hide being gay or they were at a severe disadvantage. That is now true in much fewer locations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Yeah but were they as islamophobic? I remember Obamas deportation push.

    They weren't okay with the same diversity, but maybe more total. It's arguable.

    Edit: wait, thought that was a 0 instead of a second 2. Idk man you think they really want us in their towns? Doesn't feel that way for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    The party is lead by people who would be Republicans if they happened to live in a red state. They don't actually believe in anything. They just seek power. People like this become Republicans in red states and Democrats in blue states. Centrist wafflers in purple states.

  • source
  • parent
  • They're lying. You understand that right? They're just wishy-washy fasch, and they are lying to you.

    They are not your allies. They are the enemy. They know. They have probably always known. They are arguing in bad faith and trying to get you to lay down.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    EEU social democracy is dying quickly too. It did not work. There is no left. Ever since the Reagan and the fall of the USSR and the "third way", the so called left does not believe in anything any more. Only power for themselves and taking certain positions to get elected.

    History is full of examples of democratic socialists getting slaughtered, literally. The US is responsible for much of it. The plutocrats are definitely going to try to kill them or put them in camps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The neo libs don't care if you're right. They don't support your ideals and they want you to have no voice.

    Fuck the neo libs. Fuck the fascists. They can rot together in hell. Maybe the Socialists can show them how governing is supposed to fuckin work.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    kick fetterman out for the same reason

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Shouldn't we want for the DNC to not prop up some primary candidates over others? I don't think Hogg should have been procedurally yeated out like he was, but I do feel like the DNC playing favorites is something that we as voters have historically objected to.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    The DNC should not be a king maker for sure. But pointing out inconsistencies or irregularities is a particular candidates stances with some national policy seems ok I guess. We all aren’t gonna agree on everything so a very specific national policy seems like a bad idea as well. But in the end the people should be defining what they want the party to be not the other way around.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    It [Hogg's PAC] has also backed a number of progressive challengers who’ve gone on to defeat well-funded, establishment-backed candidates this cycle, including community activist Donavan McKinney in Michigan, labor organizer Claire Valdez in New York, and professor Randy Villegas in California, who’ve each claimed Democratic nominations for the US House.

    Cool, but that's like playing on "Easy" mode. Run somebody in Missouri! Iowa. Idaho ffs. Progressives are winning in deep-blue states? Well, that's good, but in this fascist environment I'd expect voters would even go with Clinton-level Dems to win there. That they had more progressive options to choose is excellent, but don't mistake that for a nationwide movement. Because It's not showing up in the red states (yet).

    The DNC needs to jettison the consultants who want to buy TV ads. They need a core social media organization and an understanding of why to have that. They don't. Therefore, they're flying blind. These wins help nudge them in the right direction but until they can get some new leadership they're going to continue to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory unless people get out and vote for them in the unexpected areas.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    HELL YEAH BROTHER CRANK THE HOGG!!!!

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

    Fucking bullshit...

    The prior DNC fucked up the vice chair election Hogg won.

    The new DNC chair, said the ethical thing to do, was to re-run the vice elections, this time according to the rules.

    Hogg would have 100% won that, but he declined to run in the election despite being virtually guaranteed to win

    Hogg's problem should be with Jamie Harrison for fucking up the first one that Hogg won.

    But my problem is Hogg refused to run for the re-election, and it seems he never wanted to win in the first place. It seems like his plan was to lose and pivot to a super PAC which is what he said he was going to do when he denied to run, but I don't even think he's done that.

    All he's done is try to get people to disengage from the Dem party, and he started almost exactly as soon as neoliberals lost power.

    I don't know if he's corrupt or just fucking stupid.

    Edit:

    So to be perfectly clear:

    1. DNC voting members elected Hogg

    2. Due to a technical error about woman/minority candidates, the DNC chair said it was ethical to run the election over instead of accept the results of a fraudulent election

    3. Hogg refused to run, even though the same voting members who elected him were gonna vote again.

    4. Hogg spends a year shit talking the very people that elected him to be a vice chair. And claims that a wave of progress that happened without him, somehow proves that that the party isn't progressive even tho they've elected Hogg personally in 100% of positions he's run for. And that means we shouldn't trust the people who elected him and ushered in a wave of progress.

    If anything, this proves the DNC made a mistake when they elected him the first time.

    Dude should not be involved in a party if he doesn't even understand how this works.

    Especially since he didn't get loud again till after primaries and right before the general.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    all you ever see you do with your comments is attack the left, givesomefucks. You run interference for Ken Martin ignoring Gaza in the last thread I saw you in, and here you attack Hogg. You are as rabidly conservative a "democrat" as they come.

    Theres nothing but fascism down the road that your opinions live on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 2 comments in c/libjerk@anarchist.nexus view that post
    [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Yep. Head in the office did an interview with him a while ago (before we knew why Ken Martin didn't want to release the 2024 retrospective), and I remember thinking he just sounded like a guy tired of dealing with obvious bullshit.

  • source
  • You cannot reform the system from within. It is the enemy. It wants you dead or in chains. It does not care for the noises you make or shapes you scrawl.

  • source