Dorsey actually left BlueSky when he was unable to convince the board to not adopt moderation tools on the platform.
post
bUt bLuEsKy iS dEcEnTrAlIzEd!
No it is not?
It is on paper. You can host your own PDS (low-resource-requirement server that stores your posts). in practice, well over 90% of users use the default PDS, and even if you don't, you're subject to the whims of the relay (big-iron datacenter type server that retrieves posts from every PDS and aggregates them into a single stream for appviews to then display) that other people use to look at your posts. Bluesky is the main relay, and they have been known to censor people for the crimes of speaking out in favor of trans people in sports, or being Palestinian. Blacksky, a competing relay, seems to be a bit better, though I don't personally know much about it. But the fact remains that running a relay server is really expensive, therefore few people can afford to do it, and a relay server is a gateway through which all posts must pass before they can be seen, therefore it's a censor's dream, and those two facts together make Bluesky de facto centralized.
False comparison here, most people who use bluesky happily used twitter and left because of Musk not Dorsey. I think most of them just wanted old twitter and migrated to a platform that promised/provided that.
You have to understand that Zuck didn't make threads to snag users who objected to him and to Facebook.
I think I'm out of the loop, what's wrong with BlueSky? I don't even know what the logo on the bottom left is.
Use Mastodon/Sharkey
Fediverse alternative, not connected to nation states or capitalists.
Sharkey is just miles ahead of Mastodon and I'm disappointed no one told me that before joining.
It's not essential for my social platform
Oh, stop. If you've got something to say just say it.
There are a diversity of voices in every community that is open to the public. I would say an even greater diversity in those spaces where people go when they've grown fed up with the closed, commercial platforms.
Why are you wasting time on Lemmy then? Shouldn't you be posting on Facebook instead?
BlueSky itself is still operated and developed by a corporation though, even if an instance isn’t. Thus you’re still beholden to the whims of the people in charge of that.
Love me some greedy assholes, i trust them with my every fiber of being 😍
Jokes aside if we have more people on here, things could change pretty fast in a good way.
*puts EU sticker on US coloured pig*
"There, that makes it better"
creates EU infrastructure that connects to US infrastructure to prevent regional lock-in
What "regional lock-in" are you talking about? Isn't all the bluesky tech USAian? Aren't all the technical decisions made in the US? If they decide to introduce some kind of filtering in the code, is the EU side going to copy-paste the code , remove the offending parts, and then host it? I doubt they'll be able to keep that up for long. They are facing millions of dollars across the pond.
Its not a Bluesky alternative, its just a different frontend for Bluesky. A good frontend but nothing more.
all 29 comments