That's probably exactly what they did, deployed a sbc + some off the shelf model and increased the price 300x by making a black plastic shell.

If you have a million stolen licenses, but on the road remain very few, say 1k. While there are say 100m other cars. If you now have 99% accuracy, you will read 990 stolen cars, and misread 1m plates. Since 1% of plates are stolen, you randomly hit 10k of those misreads into a stolen plate.

This is generally alwayd an issue with rolling out mass tests. If the thing you search is even rarer than your failure rate, most detections are errors no matter how good your test.

This is why we don't just test everyone for diseases all the time even when it would be very cheap and simple.

It's basic statistics.

• True Positives (TP) 415
• False Positives (FP) 1,012
• False Negatives (FN) (Calculated using 96% Recall) 17 Target plates that were missed.
• Precision TP / (TP + FP) 29.1% When it hits, it’s wrong most of the time.
• Recall (Assumed from Global Acc.) 96.0% It successfully catches almost all targets.

That’s the problem if you are fishing for a very small number of targets out of an absolutely bonkers large pool of potential targets - at some point your false positives start becoming more and more prevalent in relation to actual positives. That is simply statistics and if flock can’t improve the global accuracy by some exponents, this problem will grow - the more Flock gets used and the more licence plates they are scanning, the more the false positives increase.

And it is a massive problem, because the false positive marks you as a criminal - that means any legal recourse gets expensive and painful. This technology creates more problems for everyday people than the amount of issues it removes by tracking actual criminals.

Cutting them down with a reciprocating saw is absolutely justified. These things are an affront to privacy and accuse random citizens of being guilty of felonies.

You're assuming that all people in the pipeline are competent

If you have a pi reading license plates, you are probably scanning a few dozen different plates a day, looking if they match a handful of possibilities. If the only plate that opens the gate is ABC123, nothing happens if it accidentally reads anything else, and I'll probably get it right a second later.

When Flock scans plates, it reads thousand of them every second looking to read and match every possible plate variation from every state (which there are over 8000 of) to every reported stolen plate, in all weather and lighting conditions. It's really no wonder if 71% of the times it reports it found a stolen plate it had got it wrong.

since its a mass surveillance apparatus, the juror/court was not its intended purpose. they likely profile(errenously) potential people who are going to be a "nuisance" in the future.

don't forget to clap

huh. i wonder if they don't have them around my town because the test one they put on the bike route i take to the next town acquired so many holes without my help i felt i didn't need to add.

Doing God's work!

If they flag all the plates, they're bound to get all the ones they're aiming for. It's a simple solution.

But on the other its not, as it can cause someone else with a similar plate number to be accused of a crime or infraction, etc that another committed.

No. Its like drug dogs. Its just an excuse to do whatever they want. Infinite monkeys writing up probable cause forms.

good thing for leo to profile people "errenously", everyone knows its for people who are going to potentially protest in the future. and abused by DV-prone cops to stalk thier SO.

Side note: There's still over the air television, it's just digital instead of analog.

Japan?