499
Peak Fiction 🐐 (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

all 51 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 3 months ago (18 children)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (15 children)

    AI in a nutshell.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (14 children)

    How so?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (13 children)

    It has no concept of the content it is talking about, and is so bland and well, disinterested.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    I beg to differ. You can't so effectively undermine and bypass the intentions of the subject you're satirizing without effectively understanding it. Most of everyone in this thread is probably into monster fucker lit or dark romance on some level

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    Try to ERP an AI. It's funny when you make a satirical post, less funny when the AI creates non-content, or thinks you want your heart ripped out, and eaten infront of you.

    Nwm, that's pretty damn funny too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    I think during that brief amount if time before everyone realized how ass generative ai was I tried using a mob boss stylized one. It didn't really know how to handle me not telling it to make sex at me. This intended dominant personality could not extricate itself from a submissive and pandering role because at it's core the whole thing is built to be a sycophantic sex toy and those behaviors will bleed through in whatever application you try to use it for. But if you got one to actually act somewhat aggressive, good for you I suppose. There is a community of dames who decided to date ai because it made them feel safer to explore that stuff

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (9 children)

    "It's curtains for you, capiche?" Nibbles on your ear and licks your eyeballs

    Oh, I tried to provoke an AI by saying I will fight it, it just makes threats, and keeps getting ready until you get bored and thrash it.

    It just takes the abuse, and continues shit talking.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (8 children)

    Anything to that effect would have been better. I just wanted to roleplay that I was Tommy Wiseau asking for a favor to leave the mob and start my dream of a film career.

    The thing just kept acting subby and asking me "so wadya want?"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Yeah, it just keept asking a question.

    It is likely because it is some 3B lobotomized model, that genuinely needs to vamp off your ideas to work.

    Even a basic 7B Stheno model will do way better.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Eh, since then it's come out that these compliment machines have sooth talked people into inceldom or killing their loved ones. I think they probably don't operate within that place of safety that was originally appealing to people. Or you know, the training data comes from other humans who are demonstrably not safe so we'll probably still be talking about dark romance lit for a long time

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    sooth talked people into inceldom

    I understand these words, but not in that order.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Sorry, I string words together poorly. Would you like the quick summary or the 30-min deep dive video?

    Lots of people started using the chatbot as a surrogate partners over the last seven years. Since the thing is a frictionless hug-box it pulled them deeper into their solitude and trained them to only respond to interactions where the other person completely acquiesces or at the very least yes/ands them constantly. Which is pretty hard for a human to be friends with another person who's used to that. Hence, inceldom

    https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=3WSKKolgL2U

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, yeah, I'm familiar with that from reddit's r/myboyfriendisai, which is...different from incels, but horrifying in its own way. Femcels?

    Like, I'm continually astounded about how AI is able to bring out the absolute worst in people

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Oh yeah, Femcels are incels. They were actually the first incels way back in the day on the old incel forum.

    It's pretty sad. I low key had higher hopes for the idea of a LLM based on a repository of human knowledge but they never should have let finance bros call the shots. Of COURSE they would build a sycophantic little reprobate of a chatbot

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Well, it's been trying to talk me out of trying to raise my IQ with experimental supplements/using posiwash on literally everyone, but I literally just talk to it, ask for suggestions, then ignore all it's opinions.

    It is weird, especially since I get angry if it sycopants, and it has that in it's memory.

    EDIT: I'd offer to play the comforter role, but I would have even less enthusiasm than Claude, as I don't REALLY want to be around.

    Guess if someone wants, I would hear them vent. I have useless opinions on that, and I try to solve problems, rather than listen.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    You're still personifying it too much. Whether or not you get angry doesn't matter to it. It has no concept of whether something matters. It's just predicting tokens based on the token correlations it encoded in its NN parameters during training plus a bit of random noise. Everything else is just trying to set up the context in the hopes that it predicts the tokens you want it to.

    And since it wasn't trained on every possible context, it's overfitted to some (eg maybe a mention of yellow will make it very likely to talk about bananas) and lacks any useful context at all for others (eg your very specific problem).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 73 points 3 months ago

    Perfect pairing to "breasted boobily"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 68 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    His vampirisim restricting his self control gave an aura of a man struggling to contain his own power, and she was what pushed him over the edge and to lose control of himself. If anyone else had done what he did they'd be a creepy predator, but when he did it he was the sexiest, sweetest creature to ever lay his hands upon her.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 36 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    He mysterioused mysteriously as he rolled up his sleeves revealing his strong forearms. His proud manhood stood at attention like a soldier returning from the great war, traumatized by months of unending death and torment the veins pulsating through his member quivered like a soldier experiencing a flashback.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago (5 children)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Is that Mark Watney

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
    • [–] 26 points 3 months ago

    You had me at "Vampires billionairly"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    What?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 11 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Tbf I would be interested too if they just added in "he was billionaire because he has been working as tenured professor for last 700 years. I cannot emphasize it enough when I say he was NOT a plantation owner."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    He did own a company that owned a lot of plantations, sure, but he wasn't directly overseeing any of his businesses because he was so dedicated to his true passion: teaching extremely outdated views on ethics, race, and eugenics.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    I can't stop thinking about all the fucked up shit a tenured professor of 700 years would be teaching. Jump up and down to not get pregnant, women and people with other skin tones aren't really human like us, the wonders of lobotomy, throwing virgins into volcanoes to stop earthquakes and ensure good harvests, how to beat the devil out of people who insist on writing with their left hand...

    And it's even better because the whole time you're staring at him dreamily like "Yes, this is the ideal man for me." :D

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 27 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    ayn rand?

    ...oh, actual vampires.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Stop, I can only get so wet

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 10 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Do we really need to be dunking on monsterfucker romantasy? Let them have this!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 34 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Look I get that they're actual monsters, but I really don't think billionaires should be included in the monsterfucker kink.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago*

    But what if they were evil billionaires for everyone else, but financially generous with you specifically? What if you made them lose millions just with your presence, what if they couldn’t control themselves around you? You mention liking Green Day, and the next day your billionaire has hastily reinvested everything in solar energy for you. You’re the only one who can influence them, they NEED you. They’re disgusting but your love can tame them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent