Obviously don’t trust Meta to deliver content to a child, but how is this different than other forms of media that kids are already ingesting on TV, or phones or tablets?
post
Back when I was at the bedtime story stage I just went for the books I enjoyed as a kid. We got though the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings, some of the Narnia books and some others. Even if they don't know all the words that's ok the best stories just carry you along. The youngest should be on picture books not screens but the main thing is, you are there and reading with them because that time is priceless.
Technology, solving problems nobody had.
My daughter and I love going to the library and picking out books to read before bed. I can't imagine trying to replace that with a soulless LLM.
But think of all the time you’ll save!
Instead of spending useless time bonding over the shared experience of going to the library - a publicly funded entity that is the only place in current society where you can just exist without buying things - and then the tedious time spent talking about and choosing books together, you can now have an AI care for everything. You can even use their AI to voice the story for you to remove the need to interact with your child at all!
Just give the corporate surveillance state your children. It's inevitable barring resistance.
I'm not going to knock this. I'm a pretty quiet guy and my imagination sucks. I just focus on what I need to do next. I did read to my daughter but I can't make shit up on the fly and I don't do voices
I don't understand. You could spend an entire lifetime reading existing bedtime stories from your local library. There's absolutely no reason to demolish the planet and the economy in pursuit of some sort of shitty replacement.
Some of my best memories with my daughter is reading bedtime stories and making them up when she wanted something particular.
exposing small children to AI-generated things? I seriously wonder about the effects of that on their brains...
This has the same energy as playing music for deaf people and painting pictures for blind people
Personally, i think there is a use case. I didnt check out meta ai but its fairly easy to generate good bedtime stories. And yes, parents, after 9hrs work, 3hrs commute, several more hours childcare dont have any imagination left.
Looking at the books out there, even the famous gruffelo writers, most of these books are dull story wise. The translations often lacking. The paintings are nice tho. I like the books most that have a funny singing part.
Stories is something AI excells at.
If you can't find good children's books you're not looking properly. Ask other parents, ask teachers, ask library staff etc. Just like anything most of it is bad, but there's also real gems and you don't need hundreds of original stories to entertain a kid, just a few really good ones.
Even if a story is a bit dull, it's much better written by a human than an AI. Humans have intent. AI just has a big black box trained on scraped data being churned by a datacenter. Even the dullest stories written by a human can at least have some character into them. AI couldn't even come close to someone's first draft of their first work.
Also if AI truly does excel at stories, name a few best-selling books that critics love that's written by AI (bonus points if it's not someone's scraped work).
But hey if you like mediocre manufactured soulless slop whipped out by the thousands, you do you.
...and then, the Zuck Knight killed the Privacy Dragon and married the Princess of Gold Kingdom.
The End.
Isn't the entire point of a bedtime story to turn off your brain? Shit journalism
all 6 comments