all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 51 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

That it’s public knowledge he is not only a wanna-be pedophile, but he is such a lame-ass that even pedophiles didn’t want him around, has to sting pretty bad.

Edit: I mean ”wanna-be” in that someone of his financial status was extremely excited to engage in that behavior, and they are still all “yeah, nah, mate”. He still thoroughly qualified himself as a pedo with those messages, to be clear.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Epstein didn’t bother typing anything into his subject lines half the time (his email skills rival that of the age group he was preying on).

    So when Musk replied, it was just “re: [blank]”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Don’t most email clients, or possibly even the SMTP server itself, add something like “(no subject)” when you “forget” to add a subject line (after warning you about it multiple times. I think even the pine mail client did this.) So back in the day when no one understood email, and this is way way after that time period, you would see subject lines like “RE: (no subject)”

    So it’s weird to me to just see “RE” all by itself.

    That was my point.

    But I appreciate all of the replies educating me on the history of email. ❤️👍🏻🦕

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    It shows up in the DOJ’s files without the “no subject.” Not the same Musk email, but a different one:

    It’s kinda funny how in business school, you are taught a lot about email etiquette, but at a certain level it apparently doesn’t matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Instead of having to click an extra button after clicking the send button, just put a space in the subject and the client won't ask you if you're sure you want to send without a subject. That's my guess as to why it looks this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    Sorry, couldn't resist.

    "re:" is a professional but maybe outdated way of responding to "regarding" something.

    In musk's case here, who fucking knows, billionaires all use emails like shitty chat, and pedo billionaires all talk in code, so it could honestly be anything or even an automatic subject line fill.

    I'm assuming it just means "regarding (the thing WINK WINK)"

    Edit: usually it's typed something like this:

    Subject: RE: birthday party
    Body: make sure the dancers are only paid after they perform. Also, no peanuts, half of attendees are allergic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    convicted paedophile

    He is a convicted rapist not just a "paedophile". Paedophilia is a mental condition - and we are way past that - so why spread nonsence such as "convicted paedophile" when in fact we're talking about a sex offender/rapist.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    This looks like an attempt to normalize adults being attracted to children.

    and we are way past that

    Who's we?

    when in fact we're talking about a sex offender/rapist.

    No, we're in fact talking about a children sex offender/children rapist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Nonono. People who are sexually attracted to prepubescent children have a malfunctioning part of their brain identifying viable sexual partners

    People who rape post pubescent children are monsters who are fully aware that what they are doing is wrong and fucked up and that's why they do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Reply, from the unreleased Trump-Epstein Files:

    "Look, Elon, because you've made so many requests to visit my island, I feel I have to be completely honest with you: You will never be invited to my island.

    The hard truth is that it's tough enough to keep these girls in the game, pretending to be having fun with these fat old perverts, but it would be impossible with a naked troll dancing around, saying bizarre shit. You're scary enough with your clothes on, I can't imagine how they'd feel with your clothes off. They're only little girls after all.

    Sorry, dude, but it's a Hard No.

    Your friend,

    JE"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Why didn't Elon Musk just have sex with adult midgets?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    convicted pedophile

    Pretty sure there's no crime just being a pedophile. Pretty sure the crime is acting on it. But no one really understands we're in a police state...meaning the state is police and Epstein was Mossad and thus a cop and is still alive because he was a cop. Cops have to tell the truth, right? Yea, the state is lying to you. Trumps a cop too. Hunter Biden. The Clintons. Israel is a cop, ffs. Lost tribe strategy; have part of your network play the heel for intelligence gathering and counterintelligence purposes. But I just stare at goats, what do I know having done propaganda n counterintelligence work for twelve years? You sure know more than me watching the news for twelve years, right? Bro, I wrote that news. It's not real. Operation Mockingbird was fifty years ago. The New Testament describes a decentralized autonomous organization of secret police at an eighth grade reading level. Get with the program, loser.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    This guy at least looked as a better person when he was poorer. And still after many years of being rich there are no promised Mars explorations whatsoever.

  • source
  • [+] 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I heard something like that too, but i just looked it up, and there are several articles from bigger newspapers quoting this mail, none added a correction or update saying that this mail is fake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Still, that doesn’t mean he said it.

    No, and obviously newspapers get stuff wrong or get fooled, but this would typically be the kind of thing they'd fact-check thoroughly, since it could be libelous about an extremely powerful person.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)