Last month’s midterms were an earthquake for the Democratic establishment. Across the country, progressive challengers sailed to victory calling for abolishing ICE, reducing inequality, and addressing the crisis of affordability.

But one message rang particularly clear: After years of pro-Palestine mobilizations, U.S. voters are rejecting Zionist politicians.

Nowhere has this been clearer than in New York City, a Zionist stronghold and the epicenter of mobilizations for Gaza. Brad Lander, Claire Valdez, and Darializa Avila Chevalier were outspoken about their support for Palestine, openly calling Israel’s assault a genocide. They defeated establishment Democratic opponents who in some cases received hundreds of thousands of dollars from pro-Israeli PACs. Mayor Zohran Mamdani, too, came to power in part due to his stance on Israel.

Pro-Palestine candidates are also racking up wins elsewhere. Melat Kiros (Colorado) and Chris Rabb (Pennsylvania) are poised to win House seats in November, while Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed may win the Democratic nomination for Senate.

In other words, unconditional support for Israel is becoming toxic for Democratic Party politicians. Radicalized by almost three years of livestreamed genocide in Gaza and increasing ethnic cleansing in the West Bank, for many young people in particular, Palestine has become a central issue.

But the movement for Palestine can’t let up — especially since the Democrats see which way the wind is blowing.

Don’t Let the Democrats Fool You

The movement against the genocide has forced the Democratic Party to reckon with how their support for Israel is losing voters. In April, 40 Democratic senators supported a Bernie Sanders-backed resolution to cut weapons sales to the Zionist state. (The resolution failed.) More and more politicians are rejecting money from AIPAC, and some are going so far as to describe Israel’s actions as a genocide. A few days ago in Tel Aviv, Rahm Emanuel, the former Chicago mayor and Obama administration chief of staff, said “unconditional support” for Israel must end.

So, are Democrats becoming anti-Zionist? Not so fast!

While some may be softening their rhetoric and eschewing the most objectionable elements of the pro-Israel lobby (e.g., AIPAC), these actions don’t reflect a change of heart or meaningful policy change. Rather, they’re attempts to de-fang the movement for Palestine and channel disgruntled voters back into the Democratic Party.

Emanuel, who is exploring a 2028 presidential run, is a case in point. Like many other Democrats, he pins the blame squarely on Benjamin Netanyahu, rather than on the Zionist project. If Israel is engaging in something resembling mass slaughter and ethnic cleansing, the reasoning goes, it’s only because of the Israeli prime minister’s reckless “military-only approach,” and his “unwilling[ness] to plan for a day after in Gaza.” And Emanuel’s concern comes from a place of wanting stability and support for Israel, not from any support for Palestinian self-determination.

For evidence that Emanuel is not proposing a break with Israel, look no further than who applauded his speech: lifelong Zionist Hillary Clinton, and Democratic Majority For Israel, who said his words were “grounded in a sincere commitment to Israel’s future security and prosperity.”

In other words, to the extent that Democrats have harsh words for Israeli politicians, advocate sanctions on West Bank settlers, and call for an end to unconditional aid to Israel — with that last proposal supported by Netanyahu himself — it’s only in service of recouping the country’s lost support among Americans and the international community.

Reject the Whole Democratic Party

But why are establishment Democrats so invested in maintaining support for Israel, if their base is overwhelmingly voting them out of office and turning against Zionism?

The U.S. regime’s Zionism isn’t about any one individual’s beliefs, or even about AIPAC funding. Rather, the United States supports Israel because it acts as U.S. imperialism’s guard dog in the Middle East. The Zionist state, armed to the teeth, helps wage Washington’s wars in the region, including most recently the war against Iran. This is why U.S. policy toward Israel does not fundamentally change, whether under Obama, Trump, or Biden. And it’s why the Democrats will never fully abandon Zionism, even if they sand down its roughest edges.

This is just one reason why leftists cannot support the Democrats, and why we call for organizations like DSA to break with the Democratic Party. Lander, Valdez, and Chevalier’s open embrace of the Palestine movement is progressive, and their victories are an auspicious sign of the changing tides in U.S. society. But running as Democrats helps channel this progressive energy into — and rehabilitate — an imperialist, Zionist Party. And once in Congress, they will face enormous pressure to toe the Democratic Party line on Israel.

We have the power to keep the movement for Palestine moving, and to fight for liberation for all Palestinians. After all, it’s our protests, encampments, and mobilizations that have forced a reckoning among Democrats and even caused the labor movement, including the UAW, to take up the Palestinian cause. And we can go much further. Let’s keep it up — in the streets and in our workplaces!

The post Israel Is Becoming Toxic for Democrats. Let’s Keep It Up! appeared first on Left Voice.


From Left Voice via This RSS Feed.

all 57 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 60 points 3 months ago* (22 children)

APIAC support should be a litmus test and every single DNC incumbent and primary candidate that fails it should be replaced. publicly shamed, and socially ostracized.

There should really be a litany of litmus tests but I guess we'll have to settle for not spending our tax dollars on turning Palestinian kids into skeletons.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You'll get your wish soon. Aipac support will soon be a thing of the past, now that isreal can get funds straight from their new partnership with three letter agencies. Tax dollars that go to the Pentagon will be sent without any necessary disclosure to whatever they want

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    I doubt they'll get that through before the midterms. Largely thanks to the backlash against AIPAC. But it's not like they'll lift a finger to walk back any other monstrous shit Trump has made into law.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -23 points 3 months ago (17 children)

    Nice, so you want the Epstein class to keep the larcenied money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (16 children)

    What point are you even trying to make? You'd prefer the norm to be taking the rape/genocide money?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 3 months ago (15 children)

    I’m black anarchist, my norm is to empower you and me, and get actually compensated for our labor: none of which Demagogues desire.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    Nice, so you want the Epstein class to keep the larcenied money.

    Care to explain how not voting for people who support Israel means I want rich people to keep their money? You lost me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    Not directly redistributing the money you allowed yourselves to be stolen to in the first place.
    Why are you even demanding your larcenists power over your interests‽
    Who goes to a thief and says: “pretty please stop a genocide in some foreign country you're profiting from!🙏”

    I am extremely extremely lost what is your actual political plan here. Like are you so traumatized you believe voting will end a genocide from the people that created genocide in the first place‽

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    This is perfect being the enemy of good. What is your alternative plan and how are you taking steps to organize for it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    This is perfect being the enemy of good

    Remind me how this idiom helps in your current “crisis”?

    What is your alternative plan

    I am black anarchist

    how are you taking steps to organize for it?

    empower you and me, and get actually compensated for our labor

    Take some tea or coffee, sit down, read, and let's actually revolt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (8 children)

    FYI the people who sit and read wont listen to your tactless rhetoric.

    Meanwhile people inclined towards violence enough to revolt will find you annoying af and btfo you until you stfu.

    I know cuz I hang out with the progressives and I train martial arts with the para-military-wanna bes. You'd annoy the fuck out of them to the point that you'd probably end up with a concussion in both groups actually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    FYI the people who sit and read wont listen to your tactless rhetoric.

    Commenting from experience?

    people inclined towards violence enough to revolt will find you annoying af and btfo you until you stfu.

    yet the violent are physically in power, genociding…

    I hang out with the progressives and I train martial arts with the para-military-wanna bes. You’d annoy the fuck out of them to the point that you’d probably end up with a concussion in both groups actually.

    this says more about you than what you really need to do right now, for yourself, and your “para-military-wanna bes.”

    Again, explain to the genociders how voting in their genocide system will end genocide?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Commenting from experience?

    That is what I said.

    I know cuz I hang out with the progressives

    Takes one to know one bud. Difference between you and me is that I'm trying to be better and you're doubling down on whatever this is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    That is what I said.

    Then that says more about your rhetoric than mines. 60 elections, and you're still genociding…

    I’m trying to be better and you’re doubling down on whatever this is.

    You don't know what intersection, solidarity, mutual aid, and direct action means?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    You don't know what sea lioning is apparently.

    Look you're not trying to have productive discussions. Full stop. I don't owe your bad faith shit.

    I'm calling you out on that. Do with it what you will. Well except affect positive change... you are not contributing to that with what you're saying here whatesoever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    sea lioning is apparently

    Something liberals reattempt every 4 years, and you have 2 more to lion.

    you’re not trying to have productive discussions

    You're projecting this right now.

    I don’t owe your bad faith shit.

    60 bad faith elections

    affect positive change

    what part of intersections, mutual aids, & solidarity did you affect?

    you are not contributing to that with what you’re saying here whatesoever.

    I am demonstrating, with your exemplified behavior, that your tactics haven't worked for 250 years. Repeating them again will land you in the same Red Scare genocides you have recommitted four times already. Take the time to reflect. ur boomer moves are so last season. Time to revolt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I know I signed up to bang my head against the wall but WOW.

    Look however you are correct is completely overshadowed by the ridiculously aggressive way you present your ideas.

    I can't even focus on the points I agree with you cuz I'm too busy defending your constant ad hominim attacks.

    I'm never gonna message you again, and I'm gonna block you, so don't waste your time loggin into your alto to downvote this cuz nobody is gonna see it just like nobody is going to listen to an asshole. Trust me, I'd know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    aggressive way you present your ideas.

    earlier:

    You’d annoy the fuck out of them to the point that you’d probably end up with a concussion in both groups actually.

    Yeah, you're projecting.

    I can’t even focus on the points I agree with you

    Then step back, close the device, touch grass and come back when you are able to focus on what actually matters

    I’m too busy defending your constant ad hominim attacks.

    I have not ad homine you once. I have ad criticas liberalism. These are extremely different things. I do suggest you step away for a bit, and disassociate liberalism from your actual self. Because we are both not going to be able to intersect with each other, if you don't see you're a victim of liberal propaganda. I await your refreshed disassociated true self.

    I’m never gonna message you again, and I’m gonna block you, so don’t waste your time loggin into your alto to downvote this cuz nobody is gonna see it just like nobody is going to listen to an asshole. Trust me, I’d know.

    I only have one alt., and gamers know it. I barely use that alternative account politically. But no. I don't abuse the “worth reading” ranking system like astroturfers do. I have a canteen to operate that requires my attention far more than what threadiverse wishes to canvas. The only assholes I listen to are my polycules’ delicious rims. I can't wait to toss some salad rn.😋

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Glad you reminded me, I hadn't checked my new rep for AIPAC contributions. Looking pretty good! It'd be nice to have someone in TN not bought by AIPAC.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Tennessee is fucking hopeless for at least an entire generation. Full Republican control and gerrymandered to fuck. TN has a few awesome reps, but they are in the minority and hold essentially zero power outside of generating a few headlines. But the TN legislative loves to silence the black representation. For such a beautiful state, it's local government is all power, greed, and corruption.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • That kinda talk has been going on in TN since I was a kid. They said the same thing about Georgia not too long ago. I'm of the mind that breaking one-party control generally looks hopeless right up until it starts to buckle, and then change can appear to happen quickly. Sorta like gradual wear on a machine manifesting in a sudden dramatic failure. I don't know if or when we'll pull that off in TN but I don't think it's hopeless.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago* (8 children)

    The title needs to be more like "The DNC is finally waking up to the the massive cost of their accepting Israel's bribes" It was always toxic. The loss of the 2024 election proves that. They will lose 2026 and 2028 too if they dont acknowledge the obvious. Democratic party voters generally dont like funding murder and fascism. You'd think their "professional" highly-paid "strategists" would be able to understand that.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The hard truth is that winning without support of AIPAC has been really hard in the past. Certainly a part of the reason Bernie never became president for example. This only started to turn with Gaza.

    It also shows that not taking AIPAC money, has to be rewarded by voters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    The hard truth is that winning without support of AIPAC has been really hard in the past. Certainly a part of the reason Bernie never became president for example. This only started to turn with Gaza.

    Well maybe the the Democrats who felt they couldn't win without AIPAC support should move to Israel and try their luck over there. They say they hate Netenyahu, well they can run against him! (Looking at you Schumer!) I'm sure AIPAC would love that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Only 31 members of US Congress dared to not use funding from the Israel lobby. 3 Republicans, Bernie and 27 Democrats. Also Vermont is awesome with all of them not taking Israeli blood money.

    Running against AIPAC grantees your opponent gets extra funding and most of the US media is against you. It really is not easy to win that. It becomes easier the more refuse though, as that forces AIPAC to fund the Republicans

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    The loss of the 2024 election proves that.

    I really don't think that it does, unfortunately.

    It is interesting, however, that the people who voted third party, or sat out in protest will simultaneously believe that there both were and weren't enough of them to affect the outcome, depending on what argument they're trying to make.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    I voted for harris.

    You spent the entire run up to the election telling anyone who had a problem with genocide that they were too small a group to be listened to. Now you're claiming that the group that was too insignificant to listen to is to blame for Harris' loss.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago

    Didn't they JUST strike down an attempt at stopping funding for Israel?

    Also this is a bullshit both sides hit piece aimed at garner more votes for the right or whatever new hydra head that will pop up post Trump.

  • source
  • [+] -51 points 3 months ago (19 children)
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    Both parties are infected by dark money and bad faith but the left seems to want to do something about it. That means culling the sick and weak from the herd and letting newer, stronger candidates emerge from the pack that are ready to not just defend us but provide opportunities for us to grow.

    Not a single liberal Democrat does. They exist to concede.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Tanki RageBait. Block. Ignore. Move on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    What do you mean by this? Do you mean Mare is a "tankie"? If that's the case I don't think you know what people mean when they say that (pejorative for leftist that does stuff), if you mean ragebait intended for "tankies" then sure I guess?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I don't think you know what people mean when they say that (pejorative for leftist that does stuff),

    Yeah that's not what people mean when they say tankie.

    It's someone who claims to be on the left, but supports authoritarian actions by the state.

  • source
  • parent
  • 4 comments in c/pravda_news@news.abolish.capital view that post
    [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    I wouldn’t vote for a Republican, even for a dog shit picker upper position!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I believe that for real political change (and not the same old two-party pendulum between republicans and republicans-lite), voters need to accept losing elections in the short term while growing a better alternative.

    Case in point, I've been voting for a party that was polling on around 3% initially. They're eleven years old now and on 12%. Their party leader is the most popular political leader in the country too.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    In a two party system as extreme as the US, and with FPTP voting, there's a real risk that losing an election will forfeit rights that you'll never get back. Would you still have a vote after another 8 years of conservative rule?

    I rather think that infiltrating the political establishment and dismantling it from within (like these politicians seem to be doing to some extent) is much safer and doesn't risk the need for violence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment