DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Newsweek that the City of Glendale's decision was "deeply disturbing," and accused state officials of siding with criminals over public safety after unrest in Los Angeles.

Just so people are aware, this is the same rhetoric/same regurgitated talking points being used against "progressive" policies in blue cities within red states all over the country.

They are banking on an escalation of physical violence and confrontation that they will use as an excuse to establish a permanent federal and military force in California that will not be subject to any California state laws.

Why do I believe that? Because its how it happened in my own city to establish a permanent state police force that can't be regulated by any city or local ordinance.

They instigate and then argue that progressive policies have resulted in an emergency and chaos, that leaves them no choice but to step in and fix things by taking control.

They have been using takeovers of blue cities within red states as a testing ground for this kind of thing since Trump's first term.

all 71 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 89 points 1 year ago (28 children)

Any efforts to frustrate gestapo operations should be celebrated. Whether in the streets or on the policy front.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Why does your account say you are a bot? Are you a bot, or did you accidentally check the box in your account settings to indicate you are?

    I only ask because this account doesn’t have bots blocked by default, but all my other ones do, so if you are a real person I’d never see your content on those accounts.

    You might want to check that :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I clicked it by mistake a couple days ago. Someone pointed it out and I unclicked it and saved. Or so I thought. I'll check again.

    Edit - `

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (23 children)

    Frustrate and impede, just don't help them advance their agenda by giving them the physical escalation they're hoping for.

    An "insurrection" under Trump will not be handled the way an actual insurrection was when Trump instigated it under Biden. This has been planned for a long time.

    Richard Blumenthal Reveals Trump 'Martial Law' Fear

    I hope more Americans at city and state levels will start joining cities like Glendale.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [+] 25 points 1 year ago (21 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    The state believes it has a monopoly on violence. After all they've spent most of a century propagandizing the public with the idea that "violence is never the answer".

    It might have been well intended at first. But over the last 20ish years I've come to see it as a weapon. Look at France or hell, most other countries. Government tries to do some fuck shit and people riot. Farmers protest with a military parade of tractors and spraying manure on parliament. Those countries haven't had their populations brainwashed into the belief that "violence is never the answer". There exists an implicit threat of violence behind protest virtually anywhere on earth except the US and some other authoritarian countries.

    That implicit threat doesn't exist here. Not at all. And that is why protests nationwide comprised of multiple millions of people are routinely ignored if not actively suppressed by gov't jackboots. And always mocked as agitators or outliers. And our government is absolutely terrified that people will realize it. It's why Trump's military parade is going to have 19 miles of fencing and hundreds of magnetometers. Because those at the top know the pulse of the country. They have the data. They know the causes. They've squeezed people more and more for decades. They've suppressed wages while prices grew. They've allowed technologies like AI to remain largely unregulated while wiping away millions of jobs that people depended on to survive in a sink-or-swim society that doesn't value human life beyond its utility to oligarchy. They've ignored protest for decades. Protest does not work here because it has been intentionally defanged. There is no threat behind it.

    Then a fat bloviating painted cow of a man who thinks himself a king sends out masked plainclothes agents to rendition our neighbors. To kidnap people in your community. People you know. People who's children go to the same school yours do. People you see every single day. Your people. Its slow death by boiling. Suddenly interrupted by someone rapidly turning up the heat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

    There are already "leftists" on Lemmy advocating for bullying out your voice, and calling the LA protests "riots", as well as "violence," when the only known violence was to waymo cars and other private property. News orgs are showing pictures of police cars being targeted from Floyd protests.

    Eta: check midlife modlog see silencing of valid leftist voices

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    "leftists"

    Authoritarians are authoritarians, regardless of what they call themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (10 children)

    I'm kind of indecisive on the last bit. Were COVID lockdowns authoritarian? Yes, but for the greater good, imo, badly managed, but *not nearly long enough. But citizens had to eat and pay bills and rich people demanded a return to work, so we got what we got.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    I would posit that while COVID lockdowns were authoritarian in nature on their face - as in the State restricting individual liberties - the context of a pandemic made those behaviors a serious threat to the public good, and the people who instituted those lockdowns were not authoritarians in principle.

    We also have speed limits and other traffic laws, also in order to reduce threats to the public good. Would those be considered "authoritarian"? Not a snarky question, just something to ponder on as a comparison.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Speed limits and lockdowns are very different. In theory, a speeding violation only shouldn't warrant jail, but it does often because paying the fine would mean skipping bills or food, which exacerbates the issue, and that's another discussion. COVID lockdown restricted people from checking on vulnerable adults, visiting hospital patients, yet medical faculty and staff hadn't personal protection gear and returned to their families after shifts, hence my noting it was badly managed, not to mention ubi wasn't even considered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    You're absolutely right. "It's more complicated than that" is almost always the right answer, and it is here, too. My analogy was only about whether something is "authoritarian" if it ideally serves the public good. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.

    The way both lockdowns and traffic laws are implemented in practice is certainly problematic. I'd even say that traffic law implementation is worse, since "if the punishment is a fine, it's only illegal for poor people." There should have been more support for people during lockdowns, but I think that was more stupidity than malice (even if it was still partially malice).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    I think we're probably closer in agreement on this than not. I hesitate to redefine words, in a post-truth society:
    Radical leftist Democrats Antisemitism Russian bots/trolls/shills White genocide

    Eta socialist Bernie Sanders, AOC 2nd ETA liberals, moderates

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    100% in close agreement. I see you around a lot, I'm pretty sure you see me, too. Sorry if it sounded like I was being argumentative; I totally didn't mean it that way. Just talking and exploring the details of ideas with someone who I think would appreciate that!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's fine. I don't think it's healthy to agree 100% on all things, always. That means someone is lying someone is abandoning themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You're good people. I will always listen to you, even if - especially when - we disagree.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Thank you so much. I really appreciate that, feel you're a good person, too, and will return the favor. Will you do me the favor of calling me out when I fail, with you or others? Because I am human, I will fail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -5 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Every positive change, especially when that change challenges existing power structures, must be backed up with "And we'll fight you to the death over this." Yes, you hope it doesn't come to that, you hope that only the threat of revolution will be enough.

    The threat won't be enough if it's an empty threat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    When you're left with no other alternative, then yes. Why not try to form a coalition of Americans that will stand together against Trump before we dissolve into a second civil war where individual blue states are going against the entire U.S. government?

    How about some support from other blue states and jurisdictions? Where are the calls for blue states senators and representatives to vocally stand with California, where are the mayors and city councils willing to follow Glendale's example?

    Sending people into a suicide mission without actually backing them up, is like supporting a war you're not fighting in (yet). When it's your turn, you will hope that others will stand with you instead of remotely egging you on to be David against Goliath.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    Why not try to form a coalition of Americans that will stand together against Trump ...

    That's been going on a long time already, and the coalition of Americans willing to stand with fascism, or turn a blind eye to it, has only increased in size.

    Fourth box.

    When it's your turn, you will hope that others will stand with you instead of remotely egging you on to be David against Goliath.

    It's already my turn. It's your turn, too. Look for opportunities to resist where and when you can, to whatever extent you can. Frontline soldiers make up a tiny fraction of the people necessary to win a war. You can stand with resistance, even armed resistance, in many more ways than charging into battle yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They've already deployed troops. Blue states banding together to say "please don't invade us" will do absolutely nothing to stop him deploying troops, especially when the only problem Trump has with Blue States is that they are Blue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    This is the beginning. He wants an excuse to declare martial law.

    He's still holding back and being strategic at this point, once he establishes a permanent military branch to oversee California that's when shit really hits the fan.

    Getting all blue states and jurisdictions to start withholding federal taxes until we have a federal government who is actually representing us again, is a much better plan than telling a bunch of civilians to go fight the military. You are literally sending people to be slaughtered and kick off a second civil war, but I'm pretty sure you're probably fully aware of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    He doesn't need an excuse.

    How do you propose blue states "withhold federal taxes?" I pay my federal taxes to the fed directly, not through my state. Do states have mechanisms to prevent their citizens and businesses from doing the same?

    I'm not sending anyone to do anything. I'm just pointing out that if a military is gathering at your city that's a clear sign of you being invaded, and that asking them nicely to stop will accomplish nothing. In this case the first military to show up in the city is the US military, not a foreign one, but that's not a difference worthy of distinction.

    Feel free to stop paying your taxes if you want, but no rights were ever won or secured without violence (no distinction here about whether that's on or by protestors).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 150 points 1 year ago (29 children)

    Remember- it was not long ago that the government literally firebombed an entire city block in Philly because they wanted a “criminal” inside a house. They just said fuck it and took out a block of houses. Because they “can.”

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] [S] 89 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    Yep, and it wasn't even the military, it was just a local police force. I believe they killed 11 people and around 5 children. The 40th anniversary just passed.

    If a single police force using weapons from 40 years ago could do something like that without a second thought, I hope people consider what the outcome would realistically be today, when encouraging people in California to strap themselves and head into a suicide mission against police, federal agencies, national guard, military, Palantir, and private military companies like Blackwater under a president who has already told them "he who serves his country, commits no crime."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    The problem is, unless things change drastically, that is the trajectory the US is on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Again where is the actual show of support from the rest of America? This should not be California's fight, it should be all of us fighting as America against authoritarianism.

    Where are the people telling their local government they need to following the example Glendale just set for the rest of us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    As a Californian, while I'm sure we have the thoughts and prayers support from others across the country and world, I suspect we're pretty much on our own. It won't be long before other blue states are fighting their own similar fights against hostile takeover, and red states are cheering this shit on because "Commiefornia." And honestly, people are, but city councils are also doing their own balancing acts, if they aren't already MAGA infested. There isn't really a unified response as of yet, but I suspect that'll change as more of CA becomes threatened.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    We all have different battles. Ours are currently focussed on our colleges and universities, research and innovation. We recently won one where the court decided that mango Mussolini can’t prevent specific colleges from admitting foreign students out of spite. Of course there’s a major chilling effect but it’s a win.

    Also, one of our senators has been extremely vocal and active. Not much Dems can do in Congress but speaking up is a start

    And yes, we have many “No Kings”protests lined up that will get huge turnout for our population. Thoughts and prayers are on the way, but also gives encouragement for our representatives, our state, our law enforcement to do what they can.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    even better, a local police force is, still, inherently “military” in that they are a weaponized arm of a state licensed to kill.

    we’re just marketed to think differently.

    (i am adding not disagreeing with you!)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I thought he was describing Waco TX ... until I saw Philly. Close enough for another example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    even if true, should due process include firebombing and killing innocent people, or should it include “get good” and maybe not firebombing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I am not 100% on Waco. The ATF knows they went crazy there. I do know there were exaggerations in regards to the children as several have admitted in interviews that they were coaxed into making some statements. Im not saying all of it was made up, but I know some of it was.

    Remember that Waco happened over a firearm inspection that was done by the ATF. They saw auto conversion kits on rifles that they reported as illegal ... and it turns out they were NOT illegal and the ATF knew it, but raided anyway.

    Things did get crazy from there. You dont declare "total war" on an fucking end of the world cult that dreams about going out in a blaze of bullets ...because they are going to go out in a blaze of bullets. The ATF knew THAT as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (3 children)

    it’s just an example of state overreach in a violent manner. one of many. none are appropriate when one truly considers things like “rights” etc.

    the civil war was probably the last time the state was able to “legit” use violence because it was to quell an actual secession by a formal militia of more than a million traitors and terrorists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Asserting that the state has no legitimate interest in using limited violence (i.e. tear gas) to execute lawful search and arrest warrants against heavily-armed, recalcitrant pedophiles is truly one of the takes of all time.

    The Bundy standoff, the SLA, and the Waco Siege are categorically different from the firebombing of Philly or the Tulsa Massacre to anyone with a brain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    i never said they have no interest. i said they are cheating due process when they use these tactics and basically “noob tubing” which kills innocent people at the same time.

    you are ok with innocent people and children being murdered by the state because they were too scared to do it the right way? what a take. how’s that boot taste?

    remember- waco is an example in a list of many. you just post-facto know there is a monster in there and think it was ok for Reno to act like she did? What about the philly move bombing? my initial example. or the Kent State murders? Or shit … the school shooting in TX where officer INACTION resulted in more death because they were fucking pussies.

    stop. being. ok. with. state. sanctioned. murder. the examples are not different exept in the type of criminal they were going after. the same formula, state, and actions were taken which results in innocent and unnecessary death.

    catch criminals and chomos the old fashioned way and put them and only them up against the wall.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    also not for nothing but “limited violence” should never involve firebombing or tear gas damaging innocent people or even starting fires or escalation.

    stop pretending the state knows what it is doing.

    stop thinking being critical OF the state means I support the “other side” - grow up and start to think bigger.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I mean, it's fight and risk dying or stand aside while family, friends, neighbors, and children are dissappeared. I know what I would prefer in that imaginary scenario and am definitely not advocating for people to be violent against the national guard, ICE, or other federal organizations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    That wasn't the only time fascist feds bombed a US neighborhood, either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    true!! waco aside, can you send me links to others? i have a list I want to keep.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I tried to do a search for you but dog ddg and google won't list them. Perhaps someone with kagi or some other alternative search engine will be willing to provide results.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    thanks for looking! add also, Kent State!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Well, I searched specifically bombing, but make no mistakes, any police are not on the side of the average individual. For example, in my cluster of small communities, police don't even try to solve property crimes under roughly 100k. But steal a backhoe, and you may have issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Fox News Host: "We found a real live LA resident to tell us how they feel"

    Real Live LA Guy: "Yo, hey, hello from Miami, I'm here to say Go Trump! Love MAGA! Based! Chad! Bitcoin $1M, you gotta buy my book The DJ Entrepreneur! Also, yeah, love my Cuban homies. Word up to everyone who came over here in a raft with no money, no documentation, no nothin! America land of the free home of the fat bags of change, amirite! Hey Ainsley, you fine as hell, want to bounce on my thang after this?"

    Fox News Host: "As you can see, the residents of LA are terrified and cry out for a stronger police presence."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    FUCK OFF ICE FUCK OFF TRUMP

    Shit was fine here until you showed up. Simple as.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    ICE needs to be blocked from California going forward.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    We should all be following suit.

    Fuck ICE and fuck fascism! 🖕🤬🖕

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    So they are already branding illegals as criminals without due process.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    "I wouldn't have punched you if you hadn't responded normally to me punching you"

    -fully defended by the dumbest nazi bitches alive

    Nobody does this kind of shit unless they're terrified.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Meanwhile, eggs are still $8 no longer available for purchase and gas is still upwards of $4.

  • source
  • They could have just said that due to extremely decreasing popularity of ICE, the insurance costs have become prohibitive. Thats like 2 zingers in one. They could also toss in something about respecting the wishes of thier constituency for extra flavor.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    No, they explicitly stopped siding with criminals by doing that.

  • source