I believe what you're looking for is a union, not a lawsuit.

Hold up... How does paying LESS TAXES mean they have LESS money for raises? Sounds more like the company needs to be sued, not the state.

In general, you can sue if you can prove damages. A class action probably isn’t the right vessel - you haven’t lost money, but you have the perception that money would have gone to you.

Legally, I don’t think that holds much weight.

I feel like getting some media attention is a more effective angle, especially if you can gather enough detailed information and contact a journalist.

You can probably sue the state for things that are actively harmful, like creating dangerous roads. But a lawsuit trying to set different priorities in revenue and spending isn't going to get very far. Setting tax rates is fundamentally political. That's the entire purpose of a state legislature, so the remedy is at the ballot box.

TBH, I wouldn't want a random selection of unelected people from my state (a jury) to be able to have the power to decide tax rates.

Someone cannot: A class action requires multiple parties.

You cant sue the government without a specific tort, and "the state purposefully collected less revenue in order to deny giving me more money" is not a rational or legal argument. Further, you explicitly cannot sue the government for performing the duties of the government, like collecting taxes or carrying mail.

You have no actionable cause. It sounds like what youre looking for is thoughts and prayers.

While I agree with the rest of the comments saying an extended strike and a proper union are ideal, I think you best bet is to talk to a lawyer first.