It was recently proven that at least some dinosaurs had feathers after a piece of amber was found with a perfectly preserved dinosaur tail
post
Stylisaurus!
Yes we can. Hair is a mammal thing.
Also, no hairy birds.
do we know that ONLY mammals had hair for the entirety of evolution? /genuine
There is a hairy frog. But he’s something of a psycho aberration.
Well you can't just drop a bomb like that without backing it up
What the actual fuck is this misbegotten creature? It pumps blood into its hair, and it can break its toes to make Wolverine claws
Nature is metal
The hairy frog (Trichobatrachus robustus), also known as the horror frog or Wolverine frog
This is the greatest opening line in a Wikipedia article that I have ever read.
I think early feathers were hairlike but obviously in the sense of fur that covered the body. There were a lot of evolutionary factors that led to out hair that's (1.) only on the head and (2.) grows far longer than necessary.
True. My point still stands that to get to the point in the post requires a lot of evolutionary oddities that only happened in humans. So the steps are more or less the same: developing fur, reducing it everywhere except for the head and elongating it on the head. Dinosaurs might have had furlike feathers but that's where it ends.
There is also the argument to make that once early humans developed the ability to cut hair, there was no evolutionary pressure on restricting the length. So it might have started as a sign of health and strength so it grew longer to the point that they decided to cut it and from there it went off uncontrolled.
It’s highly probable if dinosaurs evolved to look like this they’d have trouble breeding and die out.
But what if a group of dinosaurs independently evolved hair or something highly convergent to it, but then that lineage left no descendants among modern birds, leaving none of them with the trait?
If we are going to make up stuff we can’t prove or disprove, at least go big. Like maybe some of them breathed fire.
all 29 comments