all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 4 months ago (9 children)

He could just like, offer to pay for protection

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    He could.

    But a life of entitlement conditions him to getting everything he wants, for free.

    Since he left the Royal “firm”, he’s finding life on the outside isn’t as easy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    To be fair, it's nothing he did that makes him a target for criminals. It's the fault of the UK making him a famous child and now-remotely possible future head of state, so the UK should probably restore balance by keeping him safe while here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It also made him rich and powerful. I think the balanced is in his favor already.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Rich but with high running costs so reportedly still depends on discretionary gifts from the king. Powerful? That's debatable now, with how many in the UK seem to hate him after years of bad press.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -48 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 32 points 4 months ago*

    Prince harry is the one who decided to not marry the usual white British aristocrat and all the papers turned on him because of it.

    They also have handled it in a pretty oafish way, but most of the vitriol he gets comes from a place of racism

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Well, according to the article they're "looking at all available options". It seems the major part of this is that the decision to not provide that taxpayer funded security came very late in the planning stages, so now they're scrambling to figure out other options.

    It may just mean a postponed trip, but as this one was based on external events (Invictus Games, per the article) the reason for the visit may not longer exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago

    Pretty sure he has the money to hire his own security.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    Really wish the media would just ignore this pair.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    I wish the worldwide media would decline reporting anything to do with those two.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 4 months ago

    “I don’t want to be royalty any longer, it’s gauche, I just want all the benefits that royalty get.”

    Fuck your entire lineage.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Fair enough. He's not a working royal, why should they pay for his protection?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Because the association is the cause. This isn't something he's done himself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    funny

    when they are civilians suddenly being in their own country is unliveable without a private military

  • source