all 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 103 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

It’s not an hallucination, it just found search results from a better dimension

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 4 months ago

    I wish that too, DDG.

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    Imagine Trump getting rabies, the story leaks, he denies it and all his cronies around him back up the lie, right up until he turns rabid and starts biting and attacking them. Would be a fitting ending for him.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Only if it gets caught on video.

    However it finally happens I want it to either be during a public event or caught in good quality.

    That video (if gory enough) could cure cancer. I usually hate got, but I would stare at that video for hours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Still plenty would make sure to say fake or AI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    People say everything is AI. As long as I know it's real, idc what people say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Animals get all rabid and starts biting stuff to spread the disease like IRL zombies, but for some reason humans just get scared of drinking water, starts shaking and then die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago

    LET IT COOK.

  • source
  • [–] 50 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    As funny as this is (and I do find it funny), it's also concerning on a wider level. A good number of people trust these AI summaries; they shouldn't, but they do. And if it's this easy to poison the AIs, imagine how easy it is for someone with an actual agenda to mislead people in ways that aren't as fantastical and quickly spotted.

    I seem to recall reading recently that a court in Germany wanted to hold Google accountable for the content of its AI summaries. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong, please.) If companies are going to shove these models in people's faces they should absolutely be responsible for the results. If your model can't tell fact from fiction, stop publishing - and promoting - it as fact.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The case recently resolved in the plaintiff's favour. though Google intends to appeal, so it's up in the air how things go.

    And if it's this easy to poison the AIs, imagine how easy it is for someone with an actual agenda to mislead people in ways that aren't as fantastical and quickly spotted.

    Equally concerning is that these systems are now seeing use in a range of things. There are lawyers who use it to file suits when they shouldn't be, and a US lawmaker was recently found to be using AI to draft laws. What happens when things like that make it into the models training data, rather than just being pulled in by RAG/web tools? They'd become part of the base knowledge of all the models of that line going forward.

    It's funny when it's outlandish. The question becomes what happens when it isn't? Even without an agenda, what happens when it cites an outdated/incorrect source, or assumes that someone making a joke was correct, and ends up drawing from that when filling a lawsuit/drafting a law?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Thank you for finding the link! I've no doubt Google will fight for as long as they can, but hopefully the German courts will hold their ground.

    I'm far from an expert, but I feel like this is one of the limiting factors of LLMs - they have no sense of broader context. Truth vs. lie, outdated info vs. something that's old but still correct... I'm not sure there's ever going to be an LLM (at least one built in the way they are now) that will be good at actually producing correct responses. Maybe one day we'll find a new way of achieving that goal, but I suspect what we're seeing now isn't going to be it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago

    And this is why you use No-AI DuckDuckGo

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago

    They fed the world‘s knowledge into the machine and it concluded that surely that fucker must be gone by now.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    To be fair. 🎶 To. Be. Fair. 🎶 DuckDuckGo also offers NoAIDuckDuckGo. NoAIDuckDuckGo

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    is this picture from after he blew bubba?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Well I guess it's true that AI tells us what we want to hear...

    Also did Duck Duck Go go stupid AI... I thought that literally was the search engine for people who are sick of googles BS.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    It's toggeable. You can switch off all LLM stuff with a button.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    As if rabies would have anything to do with that horrible wobbling bag of obesity!!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Duck.ai can tell the future? I hope

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    okay you know what maybe i do want to use ddg's ai now.

    we have to speak of percentages. like this moves it from a 5% yes 95% no to a 20% yes 80% no. Unfortunately, the best way to get me to do something is to make me laugh. I wish logic worked better than humor on me, but i know my levers.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Ok who wrote that fic and where in AO3 can we read it? DDG has to had gotten the info from somewhere...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Wait wat? I thought ddg were fully into the "No AI" train

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    No such luck. I switched to startpage. Better results, and no ai bs

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I wish 🙄

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/Aii@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Can’t replicate.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    To be fair. 🎶 To. Be. Fair. 🎶 DuckDuckGo also offers NoAIDuckDuckGo. NoAIDuckDuckGo

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    That would be fitting.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    Doesn't that just mean that many people in the internet wish that Trump dies of rabies?

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/artificial_intel@lemmy.ml view that post

    theres hallucinating, and then theres just wishful thinking... a first for ai?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    DDG actually lets you turn AI shit off so I didn't notice

  • source