155
Youth as young as 12 see OnlyFans as an appealing alternative to traditional work, study finds (www.psypost.org)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A new study published in the journal Sexuality & Culture has found that many adolescents in Spain, including those as young as 12, are not only aware of OnlyFans but also see it as a viable and even empowering way to make money. In group discussions with over 160 teenagers, researchers discovered that platforms promoting erotic content are influencing how young people—especially girls—view economic opportunity, self-worth, and sexuality. Teens frequently framed content creation as a personal choice or expression of agency, while minimizing the risks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -9 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

Eh, not really. Trichinosis is very much real and, before people could reliably check the temperature of the meat being cooked, "a pork chop could kill you!" (Chris Rock in some early 00s special, lol). Today, it's mostly a sign of belonging, and 'proves' you can restrain yourself at least a little from all and every pleasure. And I stand by an alcohol prohibition, or at least being wary of its consumption. I've never met a single person who wouldn't be an overall better human being if they simply stopped drinking/relying on it to handle situations, emotions and thoughts instead of approaching them soberly. You can tell me you enjoy booze (ofc!), but you can't tell me in earnest it's eudaimonically 'good for you'.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    and now that we know what is bad about pork they’ve revised their beliefs right?

    that’s the problem with religion: some rules were made thousands of years ago for a society that looked completely different and whose only way of dealing with the world was to make up myths to explain things they don’t know

    this is not applicable to modern society… you say spain should embrace their muslim roots, but why? morality isn’t inherent to religion, and id argue a lot of religion is inherently immoral - or at least, a lot of organised religion and religious people are very immoral compared to many atheists who approach these things from a “but why” perspective rather than a “because god said” perspective

    solve problems; don’t apply blanket rules that often don’t make sense

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Because the well of Christianity has been poisoned since the time of the Romans and the West hasn't produced anything to replace religion competently. And who does the pork ban/dislike hurt? Definitely not pigs! And God puts it on the same level as eating raw blood and carrion: it's bad for you, bodily wise, not morally. And if you can't even restrict yourself to not eat ONE of all the animals in the world, what will you control? Lol. Most of the Qur'an is nothing but moral precepts, and objective morality kinda does require the belief in God's objective right and wrong judgements. Moral relativity is a plague in the West because they cannot even conceive the fact that some things are good and to be sought and others are bad and to be avoided. But no, the Western man thinks anything can go, it's just 'cultural differences' and 'don't stop me, this is my life!' (doesn't believe in a Day of Judgment and doesn't care about their impact in others life).

    The best advice I can give you is to read the Qur'an assuming most of what you've learned is nothing but wind. Your soul is in your hands, I did my part today.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    same level as eating raw blood and carrion: it's bad for you

    is it actually though? sources to prove it’s as bad as eating carrion please

    if you can't even restrict yourself to not eat ONE of all the animals in the world

    completely false equivalence. i can if there’s a reason. if there’s no reason, why would i? and more importantly: why should anyone be able to push that opinion on anyone else… religion or not

    objective morality kinda does require the belief in God's objective right and wrong judgements

    abbbbsolute bullshit… my morality comes from my existence in this world being a positive, or at least neutral one to other people… the huge majority of religion has caused pain and hardship for untold numbers of humanity… if that’s your “objective morality” then you should reexamine your philosophy from the ground up

    me, i don’t build my morality on what anyone else says - that’s how you lead to controlling bullshit like sex is bad, a woman’s place is in the home, etc… THAT is religious morality

    meanwhile you’re berating people for being immoral because they don’t follow your specific idea of what’s moral… what was that you said about “doesn't care about their impact in others life”?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •