Lemmy be like
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -5 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    See I get the point of people hating what they call 'AI' here, I totally get it but I can't see people using wrong terms since I know the correct one. The big corpos already misuse the term saying everything they made AI without specifying what kind of AI it is and people here that I assume techie also went to the wrong path (so you guys sounds the same as those evils, and u fell on the marketing). It's not about whataboutism — it's fixing what people always normalize using wrong terms when talking about technical stuff. I don't care if you still don't get it tho, I do what I can for saying the truth. And I don't think you do know what 'whataboutism' really is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Providing a counterexample to a claim is not whataboutism.

    Whataboutism involves derailing a conversation with an ad-hominem to avoid addressing someone's argument, like what you just did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah, go cry about it. People use AI to help themselves while you’re just being technophobic, shouting ‘AI is bad’ without even saying which AI you mean. And you’re doing it on Lemmy, a tiny techno-bubble. Lmao.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)