Because trying to overturn a century of scientific consensus is definitely controversial, at best.
I don’t think what I’m suggesting is “trying to overturn a century of scientific consensus”. It’s a mildly different interpretation of the same math, that doesn’t require many physical worlds. It’s also not that uncommon. The “many worlds” idea is not scientific consensus. Go read about interpretations of quantum mechanics from sources other than Sean Carroll.
How, specifically, are you modeling the double slit experiment using only Newtonian Mechanics? How about quantum tunneling?
Both the double slit experiments and quantum tunneling emerge when you apply quantum statistics to any point particle following Newtonian mechanics.
Are claiming that super positions don't actually exist at all? Because, again, you'd better have a solid argument for such a radical claim.
Superpositions are a mathematical tool for describing the statistics of potential measurements.