▲ 353 ▼ Rockstar Games Plans Age Verification For GTA Online (rockstarintel.com) submitted 1 year ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 145 points 1 year ago (18 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 1 year ago (1 child) Then they double killed it when they started introducing nonsense like flying cars with rocket launchers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago Don't forget when they triple killed it by not enabling Proton support. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago (6 children) I don’t understand why people needed to give them constant money. For real, I played for a minute but never spent a dime. Why buy things when you can achieve them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago To be honest I regret spending so much time earning money and buying so many cars. It would have been more fun riding around in a stolen piece of trash robbing liquor stores with a friend than grinding the bank heist over and over. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Because it's extremely annoying to earn enough money. Payouts are pathetic and things are extremely expensive to push you towards buying money. I didn't spend any money on it thankfully, that's just my reasoning behind it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago This is definitely the way I feel. Even if I really want to do something, if I find out they’re doing this to squeeze me or they’re putting some wild shit in the privacy policy, I just don’t engage with their shit. Fuck those companies. I’m more angry with capitalism than I am susceptible to the desire they try to garner permalink fedilink source parent [–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago It was great the first couple years when people were just throwing piles of in game money around so everyone could play with all the flashy things. After they cinched up every money glitch and started pushing shark cards…online instantly lost any appeal. As you said, grinding for things in game is purposefully tedious and geared to make you spend more money. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago Because number go up. lol Also everything is insanely expensive in online. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Unfortunately, the online component easily becomes a profitable sideline. Sarcastically, it's what keeps some game corporation CEOs afford their lifestyles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I fucking hate how there is starvation and homelessness in the world, at the same time as there is morons blasting cash away into imaginary online points. permalink fedilink source parent [–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (6 children) On the flip side, it's given it insane longevity and made it feel more modern. Playing singleplayer feels so annoying at times because of their arbitrary rules (which are still in online, but toned down a little) and gameplay/mission design. At least GTAO showed everyone rockstar's true nature, and you couldn't turn away or say that it's a small alternative game mode. So shoutout to online and 5 as a whole for showing me enough to avoid all future rockstar titles lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (5 children) GTA5 was released in 2013. GTA6 is being released 13 years later. If there had been no GTAO, we would have had at least one or two more "modern" GTA releases in that window. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago I would think so. Considering for how detailed the world is, I can see them working for a long time on it (maybe not 13 years but longer than between 4 and 5). permalink fedilink source parent [–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 year ago (3 children) I wouldn't be so sure. Modern AAA games are insanely big and resource-intensive. Just look at rdr2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago* We still wouldn't have several full games is my point permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago They want money though, they would be selling content instead of shark passes or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 1 year ago (1 child) Then they double killed it when they started introducing nonsense like flying cars with rocket launchers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago Don't forget when they triple killed it by not enabling Proton support. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago Don't forget when they triple killed it by not enabling Proton support. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago (6 children) I don’t understand why people needed to give them constant money. For real, I played for a minute but never spent a dime. Why buy things when you can achieve them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago To be honest I regret spending so much time earning money and buying so many cars. It would have been more fun riding around in a stolen piece of trash robbing liquor stores with a friend than grinding the bank heist over and over. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Because it's extremely annoying to earn enough money. Payouts are pathetic and things are extremely expensive to push you towards buying money. I didn't spend any money on it thankfully, that's just my reasoning behind it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago This is definitely the way I feel. Even if I really want to do something, if I find out they’re doing this to squeeze me or they’re putting some wild shit in the privacy policy, I just don’t engage with their shit. Fuck those companies. I’m more angry with capitalism than I am susceptible to the desire they try to garner permalink fedilink source parent [–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago It was great the first couple years when people were just throwing piles of in game money around so everyone could play with all the flashy things. After they cinched up every money glitch and started pushing shark cards…online instantly lost any appeal. As you said, grinding for things in game is purposefully tedious and geared to make you spend more money. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago Because number go up. lol Also everything is insanely expensive in online. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago To be honest I regret spending so much time earning money and buying so many cars. It would have been more fun riding around in a stolen piece of trash robbing liquor stores with a friend than grinding the bank heist over and over. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Because it's extremely annoying to earn enough money. Payouts are pathetic and things are extremely expensive to push you towards buying money. I didn't spend any money on it thankfully, that's just my reasoning behind it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago This is definitely the way I feel. Even if I really want to do something, if I find out they’re doing this to squeeze me or they’re putting some wild shit in the privacy policy, I just don’t engage with their shit. Fuck those companies. I’m more angry with capitalism than I am susceptible to the desire they try to garner permalink fedilink source parent [–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago It was great the first couple years when people were just throwing piles of in game money around so everyone could play with all the flashy things. After they cinched up every money glitch and started pushing shark cards…online instantly lost any appeal. As you said, grinding for things in game is purposefully tedious and geared to make you spend more money. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago This is definitely the way I feel. Even if I really want to do something, if I find out they’re doing this to squeeze me or they’re putting some wild shit in the privacy policy, I just don’t engage with their shit. Fuck those companies. I’m more angry with capitalism than I am susceptible to the desire they try to garner permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago This is definitely the way I feel. Even if I really want to do something, if I find out they’re doing this to squeeze me or they’re putting some wild shit in the privacy policy, I just don’t engage with their shit. Fuck those companies. I’m more angry with capitalism than I am susceptible to the desire they try to garner permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago It was great the first couple years when people were just throwing piles of in game money around so everyone could play with all the flashy things. After they cinched up every money glitch and started pushing shark cards…online instantly lost any appeal. As you said, grinding for things in game is purposefully tedious and geared to make you spend more money. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago Because number go up. lol Also everything is insanely expensive in online. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Unfortunately, the online component easily becomes a profitable sideline. Sarcastically, it's what keeps some game corporation CEOs afford their lifestyles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I fucking hate how there is starvation and homelessness in the world, at the same time as there is morons blasting cash away into imaginary online points. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I fucking hate how there is starvation and homelessness in the world, at the same time as there is morons blasting cash away into imaginary online points. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (6 children) On the flip side, it's given it insane longevity and made it feel more modern. Playing singleplayer feels so annoying at times because of their arbitrary rules (which are still in online, but toned down a little) and gameplay/mission design. At least GTAO showed everyone rockstar's true nature, and you couldn't turn away or say that it's a small alternative game mode. So shoutout to online and 5 as a whole for showing me enough to avoid all future rockstar titles lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (5 children) GTA5 was released in 2013. GTA6 is being released 13 years later. If there had been no GTAO, we would have had at least one or two more "modern" GTA releases in that window. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago I would think so. Considering for how detailed the world is, I can see them working for a long time on it (maybe not 13 years but longer than between 4 and 5). permalink fedilink source parent [–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 year ago (3 children) I wouldn't be so sure. Modern AAA games are insanely big and resource-intensive. Just look at rdr2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago* We still wouldn't have several full games is my point permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago They want money though, they would be selling content instead of shark passes or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (5 children) GTA5 was released in 2013. GTA6 is being released 13 years later. If there had been no GTAO, we would have had at least one or two more "modern" GTA releases in that window. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago I would think so. Considering for how detailed the world is, I can see them working for a long time on it (maybe not 13 years but longer than between 4 and 5). permalink fedilink source parent [–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 year ago (3 children) I wouldn't be so sure. Modern AAA games are insanely big and resource-intensive. Just look at rdr2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago* We still wouldn't have several full games is my point permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago They want money though, they would be selling content instead of shark passes or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago I would think so. Considering for how detailed the world is, I can see them working for a long time on it (maybe not 13 years but longer than between 4 and 5). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 year ago (3 children) I wouldn't be so sure. Modern AAA games are insanely big and resource-intensive. Just look at rdr2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago* We still wouldn't have several full games is my point permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago They want money though, they would be selling content instead of shark passes or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago* We still wouldn't have several full games is my point permalink fedilink source parent
[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago* We still wouldn't have several full games is my point permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago They want money though, they would be selling content instead of shark passes or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent