62
What are your ideas to improve PieFed? Vote for your favorites! Features (piefed.social)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/piefed_meta@piefed.social
117 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm super impressed by the features I'm discovering using Piefed! I'm going to be experimenting a lot with the keyword filter particularly. Here are some ideas we might add to make Piefed even better. Share you own in the replies.

Some of these options where too long to make it a poll.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

Any instance implementing this is going to be defederated quickly by other instances due to the ease of vote manipulation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    One voting agent per user. Banning the voting agent is as easy as banning the user. There is literally no difference here in terms of combatting vote manipulation besides the "feels" of not knowing a particular text string. This is literally just politics and has no basis in any real problem. I could just as easily make my own second "voting user." The only difference is the ergonomics of that workflow.

    "Vote manipulation" doesn't even matter since there is no karma. Just remove down votes from rank and engagement metrics. Problem solved. I really cannot believe how much y'all are twisting yourselves in circles to make this seem like a bad idea. Again, fuck the politics, I thought we were focused on the tech?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    “Vote manipulation” doesn’t even matter since there is no karma.

    You are aware that Piefed has a "Note" and "Attitude" fields on profiles that are affected by votes? Note is admin-only, attitude is public (yours is 98% at the moment)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent