▲ 445 ▼ Tea App A Second Tea Breach Reveals Users’ DMs About Abortions and Cheating (www.404media.co) submitted 1 year ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 112 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/tea-app-leak-worsens-with-second-database-exposing-user-chats/ https://redlib.orangenet.cc/r/AskWomen/comments/1m9ydcn/what_iswas_the_tea_app_actually_like/
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago (14 children) That's what the creator of the site said it was for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] mang0@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago (6 children) Would you believe me if I told you some systems are used for other things than what's intended? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 year ago (5 children) Sure, if you have evidence. What do you think it was really being used for? And what's your evidence? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] mang0@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (4 children) No need for evidence. The idea of anyone being able to claim anything about a person without proof is inherently flawed. Are you saying that the app has some magical feature which forces everyone to tell the truth? No disgruntled ex can make up things about their previous partner? I would love to see you prove that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) No, of course I'm not saying that. It's a profoundly stupid idea because it is so open to abuse. That doesn't mean that the majority of users are abusing it, though, which seems to be what you're claiming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I can't think of any way to use the app that doesn't rely on posting pictures and personal information of people without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I guess if you think "This dude acts kinda rapey" qualifies as "personal information". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Which dude? How are you going to identify them? Their full name, pictures and location would be required or your information about his rapeyness is worthless. You're not going to have that person's permission to post their information and so you're doing it without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago The Uk said the OSA is to protect children. But people lie. permalink fedilink source parent [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Yeah, and the US Marshall's service said Operation Flagship was just a football sweepstakes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) And that's what the people seeking to ban encryption claim it to be for, as well. Doesn't make it true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) What is the truth, then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) That this app was set up for libel and doxxing, and would be abhorrent if the demographics were switched at all. You know the "pro features" included address and phone number? Never mind the unaccountable reviews the reviewed can't even see making targeted harassment campaigns easier, posting "address and phone number" is "bad." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) You believe that women are more likely to lie about a man than tell the truth? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago On that app* Maybe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mang0@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago (6 children) Would you believe me if I told you some systems are used for other things than what's intended? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 year ago (5 children) Sure, if you have evidence. What do you think it was really being used for? And what's your evidence? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] mang0@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (4 children) No need for evidence. The idea of anyone being able to claim anything about a person without proof is inherently flawed. Are you saying that the app has some magical feature which forces everyone to tell the truth? No disgruntled ex can make up things about their previous partner? I would love to see you prove that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) No, of course I'm not saying that. It's a profoundly stupid idea because it is so open to abuse. That doesn't mean that the majority of users are abusing it, though, which seems to be what you're claiming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I can't think of any way to use the app that doesn't rely on posting pictures and personal information of people without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I guess if you think "This dude acts kinda rapey" qualifies as "personal information". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Which dude? How are you going to identify them? Their full name, pictures and location would be required or your information about his rapeyness is worthless. You're not going to have that person's permission to post their information and so you're doing it without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 year ago (5 children) Sure, if you have evidence. What do you think it was really being used for? And what's your evidence? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] mang0@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (4 children) No need for evidence. The idea of anyone being able to claim anything about a person without proof is inherently flawed. Are you saying that the app has some magical feature which forces everyone to tell the truth? No disgruntled ex can make up things about their previous partner? I would love to see you prove that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) No, of course I'm not saying that. It's a profoundly stupid idea because it is so open to abuse. That doesn't mean that the majority of users are abusing it, though, which seems to be what you're claiming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I can't think of any way to use the app that doesn't rely on posting pictures and personal information of people without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I guess if you think "This dude acts kinda rapey" qualifies as "personal information". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Which dude? How are you going to identify them? Their full name, pictures and location would be required or your information about his rapeyness is worthless. You're not going to have that person's permission to post their information and so you're doing it without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mang0@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (4 children) No need for evidence. The idea of anyone being able to claim anything about a person without proof is inherently flawed. Are you saying that the app has some magical feature which forces everyone to tell the truth? No disgruntled ex can make up things about their previous partner? I would love to see you prove that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) No, of course I'm not saying that. It's a profoundly stupid idea because it is so open to abuse. That doesn't mean that the majority of users are abusing it, though, which seems to be what you're claiming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I can't think of any way to use the app that doesn't rely on posting pictures and personal information of people without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I guess if you think "This dude acts kinda rapey" qualifies as "personal information". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Which dude? How are you going to identify them? Their full name, pictures and location would be required or your information about his rapeyness is worthless. You're not going to have that person's permission to post their information and so you're doing it without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) No, of course I'm not saying that. It's a profoundly stupid idea because it is so open to abuse. That doesn't mean that the majority of users are abusing it, though, which seems to be what you're claiming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I can't think of any way to use the app that doesn't rely on posting pictures and personal information of people without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I guess if you think "This dude acts kinda rapey" qualifies as "personal information". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Which dude? How are you going to identify them? Their full name, pictures and location would be required or your information about his rapeyness is worthless. You're not going to have that person's permission to post their information and so you're doing it without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I can't think of any way to use the app that doesn't rely on posting pictures and personal information of people without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I guess if you think "This dude acts kinda rapey" qualifies as "personal information". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Which dude? How are you going to identify them? Their full name, pictures and location would be required or your information about his rapeyness is worthless. You're not going to have that person's permission to post their information and so you're doing it without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I guess if you think "This dude acts kinda rapey" qualifies as "personal information". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Which dude? How are you going to identify them? Their full name, pictures and location would be required or your information about his rapeyness is worthless. You're not going to have that person's permission to post their information and so you're doing it without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Which dude? How are you going to identify them? Their full name, pictures and location would be required or your information about his rapeyness is worthless. You're not going to have that person's permission to post their information and so you're doing it without their consent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago The Uk said the OSA is to protect children. But people lie. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Yeah, and the US Marshall's service said Operation Flagship was just a football sweepstakes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) And that's what the people seeking to ban encryption claim it to be for, as well. Doesn't make it true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) What is the truth, then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) That this app was set up for libel and doxxing, and would be abhorrent if the demographics were switched at all. You know the "pro features" included address and phone number? Never mind the unaccountable reviews the reviewed can't even see making targeted harassment campaigns easier, posting "address and phone number" is "bad." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) You believe that women are more likely to lie about a man than tell the truth? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago On that app* Maybe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) What is the truth, then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) That this app was set up for libel and doxxing, and would be abhorrent if the demographics were switched at all. You know the "pro features" included address and phone number? Never mind the unaccountable reviews the reviewed can't even see making targeted harassment campaigns easier, posting "address and phone number" is "bad." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) You believe that women are more likely to lie about a man than tell the truth? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago On that app* Maybe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) That this app was set up for libel and doxxing, and would be abhorrent if the demographics were switched at all. You know the "pro features" included address and phone number? Never mind the unaccountable reviews the reviewed can't even see making targeted harassment campaigns easier, posting "address and phone number" is "bad." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) You believe that women are more likely to lie about a man than tell the truth? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago On that app* Maybe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) You believe that women are more likely to lie about a man than tell the truth? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago On that app* Maybe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago On that app* Maybe. permalink fedilink source parent