445
Tea App A Second Tea Breach Reveals Users’ DMs About Abortions and Cheating (www.404media.co)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
112 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/tea-app-leak-worsens-with-second-database-exposing-user-chats/

https://redlib.orangenet.cc/r/AskWomen/comments/1m9ydcn/what_iswas_the_tea_app_actually_like/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Arguing that tea was for "telling on predatory dudes" is like saying backdooring encryption is to catch people spreading CP.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    That's what the creator of the site said it was for.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Would you believe me if I told you some systems are used for other things than what's intended?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Sure, if you have evidence. What do you think it was really being used for? And what's your evidence?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    No need for evidence. The idea of anyone being able to claim anything about a person without proof is inherently flawed. Are you saying that the app has some magical feature which forces everyone to tell the truth? No disgruntled ex can make up things about their previous partner? I would love to see you prove that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No, of course I'm not saying that. It's a profoundly stupid idea because it is so open to abuse. That doesn't mean that the majority of users are abusing it, though, which seems to be what you're claiming.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I can't think of any way to use the app that doesn't rely on posting pictures and personal information of people without their consent.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I guess if you think "This dude acts kinda rapey" qualifies as "personal information".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Which dude? How are you going to identify them?

    Their full name, pictures and location would be required or your information about his rapeyness is worthless.

    You're not going to have that person's permission to post their information and so you're doing it without their consent.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    And that's what the people seeking to ban encryption claim it to be for, as well. Doesn't make it true.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    What is the truth, then?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That this app was set up for libel and doxxing, and would be abhorrent if the demographics were switched at all.

    You know the "pro features" included address and phone number? Never mind the unaccountable reviews the reviewed can't even see making targeted harassment campaigns easier, posting "address and phone number" is "bad."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •