you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

Arent roads useful for more things than cars? Biking on a road that is filled with small rocks is not fun

Streets can also allow kids play if there arent cars on them

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • A road is more than a smooth, flat surface. A road that's designed for cars has to have an extensive roadbed of gravel and soil laid down, as well as a thick base of pavement on which to lay the surface, because of the weight of vehicles. A bike path, or a street where children can play, is comparatively speaking just some asphalt.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    roads designed for cars are massively larger than roads that aren't made for cars, a standard modern car-centric road would be a pretty major and significant thing for most of human history.

    A single standard car lane is a generously wide bike path.

  • source
  • parent