you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If you’re going to make broad generalizations about every trans person like that, I mean, maybe. There are trans people that read HP and trans people that don’t GAF.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (41 children)

    Brother, it’s Harry Potter which is not exactly a thing you can’t live without lmfao

    You’re making it sound like they’re asking you to give up breathing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Saying "I can't live without Harry Potter", that's hyperbole. Or if you're serious, it's just funny.

    The argument is that funding Harry Potter directly funds JJ Rowling - whom then proudly and openly uses her wealth to pay for campaigns to enact anti-trans legislation and pays suppot to regressive anti-LGBTQ groups. Its a boycott.

    People are justified in judging those who know this yet continue to support Rowling's products monetarily or act in them as LGBT hostile.

    From all the online back and forth I've seen though, few care if you pirate them therefore denying monetary support <- that's nuance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (34 children)

    Nuance? Nuance is not to jump to conclusions about the entire trans community and the "insane judgement" of anyone who disagrees with you. You're making all kinds of assumptions and not demonstrating much ability with nuance so far.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (33 children)

    I was told earlier to walk into the sea for my opinion if enjoying Harry Potter. I am not generalizing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [+] 22 points 1 year ago* (30 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 12 points 1 year ago (28 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 11 points 1 year ago (25 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago (23 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago (21 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago* (19 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (17 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (15 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    "you don't seem to want to engage but want to inflict"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (13 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Your exchange with this dude is what I imagine you would get if you asked chatgpt "argue with me, but be wrong about every single thing, including small stuff that doesn't even matter"

    I don't think I've ever seen someone have so many shit takes back to back. Dude is batting .000

    "I'm not looking at my screen bro, I swear, nuh uh"

    What is it even for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe I’m a trans hater like the trans community wants to paint anyone that enjoys Harry Potter.

    That kind of wild generalization certainly makes you sound like a trans hater.

    No one is claiming that everyone who likes Harry Potter hates trans people. But any interaction you have with Harry Potter books, movies, merchandise, etc. makes money for one of the most prominent trans haters in the world and helps her to spread her hateful message. At least pirate her stuff if you care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    you literally came into this thread with an agenda

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Feigning ignorance of the meaning of the word "agenda" is not a defense.

    You have an agenda. You went in the comments to spread it. And it's incredibly obvious to anyone who can read.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Attempting to both deny your agenda and then asserting it in the same comment. Truly peak.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Does agenda mean opinion? I'm confused here actually

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You came into a comment thread, unsolicited, shared your opinion, and then jumped on every opportunity to argue, in bad faith btw, against much more levelheaded and informed opinion. You reek of enlightened centrism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Yes. You are. We are asking you not to engage with a very specific thing, and you are refusing. You are stamping your feet like a toddler that we are asking you not to give money to someone that is using that money to fund anti-trans lobbying.

    So yes, you are a "trans hater" and need to do better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You don't see how cultural relevance has caused HBO to cut JK Rowling a check in order to make this show, which she then turns around and donates to anti-trans organizations?

    Pirate or not, people watching and interacting with this stuff and talking about it with other people keeps it in the public consciousness. As long as it remains part of the zeitgeist then Rowling continues to profit from it.

    It's quite easy to find other, better stories about wizards that don't directly fund bigotry. I recommend Dresden Files.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Oh yeah, you're a trans hater if you're paying for any HP media. No doubt or questions about it. Straight up scumbag move to be funding that shit.

    If you're paying her, you're part of the reason she has so much money to give her anti-trans organisations. It's directly causal and you need to take responsibility for where you're sending your money. 🙏

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    What is there to even enjoy? The world building is trash, the characters are shallow, and the setting is mid and bland. You really going to die on this hill?

    Read another book, I'm begging you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    As I've stated. I don't spend money on her. So learn to read before judging. Lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    I also hate that you're defending people who give money to the transphobe. Whether you give her your money or not doesn't change the fact that you're going to bat for people who do give her their money.

    If all of her fans only pirated I wouldn't mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)