What's your favorite?

Days, Weeks or Years?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I mean, that was just the character's understanding of the virus at that point. The latest movie shows that there is some variability or mutation in the virus and its effects on victims so it isn't a huge stretch to have at least some infected retain the instinct to eat.

This is what I mean by some suspension of disbelief, like sure you might notice that detail but it is a minor retcon at worst, though I don't think its even that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I wouldn't call it a minor retcon. That's how the outbreak in the original film resolved, and how 28 Weeks Later started. You could argue it caused a mutation this time, but that only requires even further suspension of disbelief if the rules don't stay consistent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Is it particularly unbelievable that a virus that affected most of the UK population would have regional mutations though ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Infecting new hosts is literally how viruses evolve. It's quite logical that a strain that keeps it's host alive while continuing to effect others would becoming the dominant strain.

    But this is 2025. We already know explaining that to a certain subset of the population is beyond futile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yeah i feel you. What amazes me is that in 2025 you can't just enjoy shit anymore, you have to look for plot holes and inconsistencies like you're a TVTropes moderator in a bad mood. Mfs would read a dozen papers on benzene buildup rather than enjoy the kaboom-boom for a minute.

    What a joyless way to live your life.

  • source
  • parent