Well the gorilla will make the first move in that case, and if you don't make the move while it is busy mauling the unlucky first, you could be next.

Oh who am I kiding? With how involved most people are in politics, they would not make a move until it is too late.

Assuming it's a small arena battle to the death, yes. Do or Die.

If it was a open world battle then the 100 people would just take turns harassing the gorilla until it dies of exhaustion. That wouldn't be a fair fight at all. Gorilla might get a handful of people but he's just exhausting myself more.

If not fighting is an option, I guess the men will stand in a crowd making noise and the gorilla will just chill in his corner. I suppose you have to assume that all parties are 100% committed to violence

I mean, is this just an impromptu gorilla fight, or do we get to plan?

With a bit of organization? Some guys distract it, others hit its head from behind!With a bit of luck we could start raping it after like 30 secs!

I am not saying we should, that would be disgusting! I am saying we could

If this was like a simulation and no single individual our their own safety above the group goal, then yeah. The crowd simply encircles and closes in on the gorilla, and some of the first will almost certainly die

Unless handicapped, any human child can throw a ball, catch a ball, throw a stick strait. No other animal even comes close.

And here I am feeling sorry for myself because I can't throw a cast net properly. :(

the whole premise is that it's hand-to-hand. if weapons are allowed there's no question to begin with. it's 1 man vs 1 gorilla and the man wins.

Also we got guns now. A couple of .30-06 rounds and King Kong is dethroned.