Leopards Ate My Face

leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world

10,627 readers

2,738 active

246 users here now

Rules:

The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this. If the reason is in the source but is tedious to find (e.g. in a lengthy video), you must add an explanation for where it is.
Posts should use high-quality sources (for a rough idea, check out this list), and posts should retain the title (if one exists) from works like news articles, videos, etc. You may (but need not) edit your post if the source changes the title. (If you're only using an excerpt from an article that's otherwise not about LAMF, you can use the quote in the title.) Other types of posts should have a title which accurately, relatively neutrally describes their contents.
For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal. Within moderator discretion, this doesn't just include reposts of the exact same media but also includes e.g. a secondary source telling basically the exact same story as another that was already posted.
This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

TheTechnician27@lemmy.world

418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world

How to say your law was supposed to target only LGBTQ and PoC without saying your law was supposed to target only LGBTQ and PoC (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 hours ago by stemy@lemmy.ml to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

So be it. They don't want the city finding those things, so the city shouldn't fund them. Even if the parade proceeds with private funding, it's still a win for equality.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 5 points 36 minutes ago

Having donors decide who gets a parade has its own drawbacks. And I wonder what happens if someone wants to sponsor a parade for something De Santis doesn't like. Such as gay pride lol. Or, well, use your imagination.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent