It’s not even true. Because it was definitely NOT in the company‘s best interest to smuggle hardware to China. He just enabled future competitors with that move and broke the law. He also did not have to cozy up to the orange turd to keep Nvidia afloat.

What I‘m trying to say is: He definitely did not always had Nvidia‘s interests in mind so why try to make that argument there? It‘s just dishonest.

Besides „the law says the company must make money“ does not absolve anyone for acting morally wrong. That way of thinking is why so many things are messed up right now.