you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 11 hours ago* (2 children)

Getting pissed off at voting for a house speaker with a history of opposing progressive causes after a once-in-century change election isn’t purist pique.

It is when you try to argue that AOC is No True Progressive.

Dems have a chance to redefine the party into something people want to vote for. If we can’t do it, we’re giving racist Christofascism another shot at a permanent majority. We have a lot of work to do at every level and we can’t do it with a corpodem at the top of the hiearchy.

Cool soapbox, but I never said anything different; you're acting like I disagree with you here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    aoc is fine, this is just silly posturing. Bear in mind that chuds are stupid enough to think "how do you do fellow leftist" will actually work. We have 200 things that need to happen before aoc even begins to be seen as some kind of issue that requires revisiting. She's fine, great even, and both tankies and chuds hate it.

    Just Greta Thunberg all over again, they for some reason attract hate squads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

    Couldn't agree more with the exception that it's possible schipelblorp is in fact simply a misguided progressive/leftist/etc. that thinks taking her down will magically make an equally popular and effective but slightly more progressive candidate emerge from her ashes. It won't.

    As you say, she's great, but not perfect; insinuating she's been a fake progressive this whole time is counterproductive at best, disinformation at worst.

  • source
  • parent