12
Ethics of of an AI based contract? (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 23 hours ago by to c/machinist@sh.itjust.works
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've gotten several job listings from Indeed that require CAM programming and access to a CNC. I have both. They're offering ~$135 per hour. The catch is that you use your usual work flow, make a part that your normally would and then remotely upload the results to this company so that they can train their AI to program CNC machines. I'm very against generative AI, but wow is that a lot of money for a 1 year contract. It took me 16 years to get good. Another 4 to make my own shop. But around 300k a year? It makes it hard. I'd love to know what other machinists think about this kind of thing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 4 points 23 hours ago* (5 children)

I'm not even close. But it really is a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation. I guess the real thing that's holding me up is that there are hundreds of thousands of other skilled people out there that (if I do this job correctly) could just get laid off. It sucks. I stand to gain a legit retirement, but leave many to be unable to do so. I know it's very self-centered to take the job, but fml Edting out horrible autocorrect

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

    It's the prisoner's dillema. Someone will use AI, will it be you or someone that puts you out of that job? AI is a really toxic technology.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 22 hours ago (3 children)

    It really is. I'm admittedly good enough to the point if I train this thing to the best of my ability - either MasterCam is going to buy it or maybe thousands of machinists are maybe gonna lose their jobs. I fucking hate it. I also want to not work :(

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 21 hours ago* (2 children)

    Any way you could sabotage? Train it well, but with some systematic shortcoming that is hard to spot but would become bad at a scale? Ideally something that could be written off as a honest mistake on your end.

    Obviously never talk about it or admit to it, as it's probably poorly received. But I think it's the most ethical option if you can think of a good way of doing it. You'd get the money, and if you do it well you could fight the system from within.

    Obviously I don't know enough about this specific case to know if it's feasible at all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 21 hours ago (1 child)

    If I poison this, it could quite literally take down the manufacturing ability of two continents.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 21 hours ago

    Only if they fire humans to employ AI tools instead, in which case they shoot themselves in the foot in the long run in either case. Human skilled labour remains essential if we are to have any innovation or progress. Such reliance would also make manufacturers the slaves of whoever owns the models once humans are no longer skilled for the job, and the laws of enshittification means that everything would end up both worse and more expensive over time. Making AI perform as poorly is the ethical choice.

    The challenge is to find a way where it cannot in any way be traced back to intentional sabotage on your part.

    @simple_sabotage@mastodon.social is an account over at Mastodon with useful lessons from history. :)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent