Wonder on what you guys think about this, if the future of work requires us to use AI/AI agents, and this is tied to a personal account (tied to our ID) how will that change work and our lives? Every tiny mistake, any curiosity, any eureka moment or inefficiency, all of those will be recorded, tied to your identity, forever and ever to the end of time. It freaks me out...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Just don't accept it and reject the system then. Revolutions work.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Only if its something that most people choose to do, I don't like cameras, and now there's cameras everywhere, I can reject the system as much as I want but if I want to buy the stuff I need to eat I have to go out and get recorded. Of course you can argue I could also live on a farm isolated from everyone else and grow my own food and never go into any town or city, but that's a really restrictive way to live.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Depends on your definition of what "restrictive" is. If you were born in, or even lived most of your life in a city, your perspective of reality is severely warped.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago

    My definition of restrictive is having limited access to the things people who don't live isolated have access to. I've lived both on a capital city an a more rural/countryside area, even on the countryside there are cameras on buses, hospitals, gov buildings, on houses, of not all houses like in the city, but if you go out anywhere even here, you will get recorded. (unless you go to a place without people, which as I said would be restrictive)

    My perspective of reality might be "warped" as you say, but does that change any argument I'm making? Or it's something you just wanted to say?

  • source
  • parent